Re: A thought on Layne

* Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake thus: > Can we subscribe him, WITHOUT posting priveleges, to every list debian > hosts? And then linux-kernel as well? After that, spam-l and a news-to-mail > of nanae? Nah, much more fun reading his posts I think :P I have learnt a whole lot of n

Re: A thought on Layne

* Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake thus: > Can we subscribe him, WITHOUT posting priveleges, to every list debian > hosts? And then linux-kernel as well? After that, spam-l and a news-to-mail > of nanae? Nah, much more fun reading his posts I think :P I have learnt a whole lot of

Re: Is ident secure?

* Layne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake thus: > MARTIN FONDLES YOUNG BOYS. HE WAS CAUGHT ON CAMERA SUCKING AN 8 YR. OLD'S > COCK. WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT TO BE HIS FRIEND? HE IS A FUCKING HOMO, AN ASS > BANDIT AND PROBABLY SWALLOWS HIS OWM SPERM. i DON'T WANT ANOTHER E-MAIL FROM > YOU TO REACH THIS ADDRESS

Re: Is ident secure?

* Layne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake thus: > MARTIN FONDLES YOUNG BOYS. HE WAS CAUGHT ON CAMERA SUCKING AN 8 YR. OLD'S > COCK. WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT TO BE HIS FRIEND? HE IS A FUCKING HOMO, AN ASS > BANDIT AND PROBABLY SWALLOWS HIS OWM SPERM. i DON'T WANT ANOTHER E-MAIL FROM > YOU TO REACH THIS ADDRES

Re: apt sources.list

* Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake thus: >Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for >a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I >recently did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and the >security updates cause dependancy issues that I

Re: apt sources.list

* Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake thus: >Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for >a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I >recently did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and the >security updates cause dependancy issues that I

Re: was I cracked? (rpc.statd, new version)

Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hi ya lukas > > how did you check for modified binaries ??? > > if its an upto date deb box... its a failed attempt... > if its a redhat box...time to go digging... > > you have to check the filesize of the binaries... not just the date... > compared to o

Re: was I cracked? (rpc.statd, new version)

Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hi ya lukas > > how did you check for modified binaries ??? > > if its an upto date deb box... its a failed attempt... > if its a redhat box...time to go digging... > > you have to check the filesize of the binaries... not just the date... > compared to