On Wed Nov 27, 2013 at 09:04:49, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Stefan Roas wrote:
>
> > Such code has never been valid and any assumption anyone may falsely have
> > on such code is outright wrong. Such code may do anything, which includes
> > nothin
On Tue Nov 26, 2013 at 14:37:18, Mark Haase wrote:
> Miles, the GCC developers don't consider this to be a bug, and so I doubt
> that any of it will be "fixed". For example, here is a "bug" cited in the
> paper:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30475
>
> If you have a moment, read
On Sat Nov 23, 2013 at 10:18:43, Robert Baron wrote:
> Second question:
>
> Doesn't memcpy allow for overlapping memory, but strcpy does not? Isn't
> this why memcpy is preferred over strcpy?
Nope. There's memmove for overlapping areas.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@list
On Thu Jun 12, 2008 at 18:23:57, Jens Schüßler wrote:
> * Andreas Kretschmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > am Thu, dem 12.06.2008, um 4:28:52 +0200 mailte Stefan Ramahi folgendes:
> > > XING - Powering Relationships
> > >
> > >
> > > Guten Tag,
> > >
> > > ich möchte Sie gerne in mein XING-N
n't run the squirrelmail version provided by
woody. And besides that, debian-security isn't a german mailinglist and
to that end you really should use english when posting to this list.
Regards,
Stefan Roas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gn
5 matches
Mail list logo