Quoting Lars Ellenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I got this autoreply on each of my recent posts to the list.
> maybe someone in charge of it can remove this address from the list.
> Dit e-mail adres bestaat niet
This is dutch, and translates to 'This email address does not exist'.
Regards
Quoting Lars Ellenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I got this autoreply on each of my recent posts to the list.
> maybe someone in charge of it can remove this address from the list.
> Dit e-mail adres bestaat niet
This is dutch, and translates to 'This email address does not exist'.
Regards
Quoting Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> A third option might be to create a "snort-tracker" package that makes
> it easier to build an up-to-date snort binary, complete with up-to-date
> rules. Similar to pine-tracker, but for a different purpose.
> I'm not sure if that would be feasible
Quoting Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> A third option might be to create a "snort-tracker" package that makes
> it easier to build an up-to-date snort binary, complete with up-to-date
> rules. Similar to pine-tracker, but for a different purpose.
> I'm not sure if that would be feasible
Quoting Kjetil Kjernsmo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Atleast, that is what I have seen most people doing.
> *raises hand*
:)
> I wondering, could it be an idea to have a fast-moving archive for
> things like SpamAssassin rules, Nessus plugins, Snort signatures,
> perhaps virus signatures in the fut
Quoting Kjetil Kjernsmo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Atleast, that is what I have seen most people doing.
> *raises hand*
:)
> I wondering, could it be an idea to have a fast-moving archive for
> things like SpamAssassin rules, Nessus plugins, Snort signatures,
> perhaps virus signatures in the fut
Quoting Nick Boyce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Sander's preferred option would be to remove the Snort package
> altogether in these circumstances. What would be quicker : remove the
> package, or add the warning to the web-page ? I guess we ought to do
> *something*.
Hmm...
IMHO, nobody reads the
Quoting Nick Boyce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Sander's preferred option would be to remove the Snort package
> altogether in these circumstances. What would be quicker : remove the
> package, or add the warning to the web-page ? I guess we ought to do
> *something*.
Hmm...
IMHO, nobody reads the
Quoting cdpye ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I have noticed recently that attempted connections to my box aren't being
> logged in syslog.
It's possible that RH installed a deamon like 'tcplogd' and 'icmplogd'
by default or you just enabled that option. These deamons show incomming
connection attempts an
Quoting cdpye ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I have noticed recently that attempted connections to my box aren't being
> logged in syslog.
It's possible that RH installed a deamon like 'tcplogd' and 'icmplogd'
by default or you just enabled that option. These deamons show incomming
connection attempts a
Quoting Jerzy Wolinski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I found some local root exploit (source and binary).
> What should I do?
You could post the *SOURECE* to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so they
can take a look at it. Or send it here, so we all can take
a look at it :)
Regards,
Sander.
--
| gewoon, ik zit hier
Quoting Jerzy Wolinski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I found some local root exploit (source and binary).
> What should I do?
You could post the *SOURECE* to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so they
can take a look at it. Or send it here, so we all can take
a look at it :)
Regards,
Sander.
--
| gewoon, ik zit hier
Quoting Robert Bartels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I don't see how this can be done if the ftp server doesn't support anonymous
> logins or
> fpx xfers...
For all I know you don't even have to log in to the ftp server...
If you just connect and send a PORT commando, the iptables ftp-connection
trackin
Quoting Robert Bartels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I don't see how this can be done if the ftp server doesn't support anonymous
> logins or
> fpx xfers...
For all I know you don't even have to log in to the ftp server...
If you just connect and send a PORT commando, the iptables ftp-connection
tracki
Quoting Alexander Hvostov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2001 18:04:54 -0400
> "Robert Bartels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I saw this in my logs today.
> >
> > Apr 8 15:08:43 mikado rpc.statd[179]: gethostbyname error for
> > It looks like statd is still running. Is rpc still vulnera
Quoting Alexander Hvostov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2001 18:04:54 -0400
> "Robert Bartels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I saw this in my logs today.
> >
> > Apr 8 15:08:43 mikado rpc.statd[179]: gethostbyname error for
> > It looks like statd is still running. Is rpc still vulner
Quoting wes schreiner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Not that I can see, though I'd love to know of a clean way to clear the
> scroll-back buffer. I agree it's a bit hackish. Can anyone come up
> with something better?
Ehm.. I did this:
knopje# echo -e "\033[2J\033[1;1H" > issue.new
knopje# cat /etc/i
Quoting wes schreiner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Not that I can see, though I'd love to know of a clean way to clear the
> scroll-back buffer. I agree it's a bit hackish. Can anyone come up
> with something better?
Ehm.. I did this:
knopje# echo -e "\033[2J\033[1;1H" > issue.new
knopje# cat /etc/
18 matches
Mail list logo
