Re: Can a daemon listen only on some interfaces?

2001-12-08 Thread Robert Mognet
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 07:39:44PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The only ones I didn't know about in this list are portmap and > XF86_SVGA. Firstly, I can't seem to find the config file for X where > you set the --nolisten parameter >From man Xserver(1) -nolisten trans-type

Re: Can a daemon listen only on some interfaces?

2001-12-08 Thread Robert Mognet
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 07:39:44PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The only ones I didn't know about in this list are portmap and > XF86_SVGA. Firstly, I can't seem to find the config file for X where > you set the --nolisten parameter >From man Xserver(1) -nolisten trans-type

Re: finding hidden processes

2001-12-03 Thread Robert Mognet
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 07:29:22PM +0100, Tarjei Huse wrote: For those few pid's which return no cmdline info (for instance): > pid: 111 > pid: 2 > pid: 3 > pid: 4 > pid: 429 etc... You can usually get some helpful info using: cd /proc cat pid/status Regards, Robert

Re: finding hidden processes

2001-12-03 Thread Robert Mognet
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 07:29:22PM +0100, Tarjei Huse wrote: For those few pid's which return no cmdline info (for instance): > pid: 111 > pid: 2 > pid: 3 > pid: 4 > pid: 429 etc... You can usually get some helpful info using: cd /proc cat pid/status Regards, Robert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: finding hidden processes

2001-12-03 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 06:14:33PM +0100, Tarjei Huse wrote: > > How can I find these processes? cd /proc for n in [0-9]* ; do echo -n "pid: "$n" "; cat $n/cmdline; echo; done Hth Robert

Re: finding hidden processes

2001-12-03 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 06:14:33PM +0100, Tarjei Huse wrote: > > How can I find these processes? cd /proc for n in [0-9]* ; do echo -n "pid: "$n" "; cat $n/cmdline; echo; done Hth Robert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Re: FW: a filter for tcp socket

2001-09-04 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, > hello, > this is a work i would like to study but i fall in problem when looking for > Linux Socket Filtering Documentation. [ snip ]--- > .. through Linux Socket Filtering but it seem not to be any docs about that. > is there someone who has links to docs, examples or can suggest me

Re: FW: a filter for tcp socket

2001-09-04 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, > hello, > this is a work i would like to study but i fall in problem when looking for > Linux Socket Filtering Documentation. [ snip ]--- > .. through Linux Socket Filtering but it seem not to be any docs about that. > is there someone who has links to docs, examples or can suggest me

Re: iptables install

2001-07-20 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:37:27PM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote: >Dilemna: >I want to run iptables, but I'm running stable. I have a >clean, bootable 2.4.6 kernel (took awhile, but I got it), and >then realized that the iptable package in not in stable, but >is in testing

Re: iptables install

2001-07-20 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:37:27PM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote: >Dilemna: >I want to run iptables, but I'm running stable. I have a >clean, bootable 2.4.6 kernel (took awhile, but I got it), and >then realized that the iptable package in not in stable, but >is in testing

Re: gnupg problem

2001-06-18 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, > > In fact, the only reason mailcrypt is in contrib is that it adapts to > the patent-restricted versions of gpg/pgp software. As far as its use > with gpg, it belongs in main. > A reading of the Debian Social Contract (section 5) contains the following concerning "contrib" and "non-fr

Re: gnupg problem

2001-06-18 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, > > In fact, the only reason mailcrypt is in contrib is that it adapts to > the patent-restricted versions of gpg/pgp software. As far as its use > with gpg, it belongs in main. > A reading of the Debian Social Contract (section 5) contains the following concerning "contrib" and "non-f

Re: hi, any help ? about an evil mysterious crazy Open tcp port ?

2001-05-28 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 03:05:52AM +0300, killah wrote: > how, can i see the tcp port 4350 that states to be opened useing nmap As root, you can do: fuser -v -n tcp 4350 and: lsof -i tcp:4350 The lsof command, if it finds anything, will return a PID as part of it's outp

Re: hi, any help ? about an evil mysterious crazy Open tcp port ?

2001-05-28 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 03:05:52AM +0300, killah wrote: > how, can i see the tcp port 4350 that states to be opened useing nmap As root, you can do: fuser -v -n tcp 4350 and: lsof -i tcp:4350 The lsof command, if it finds anything, will return a PID as part of it's out

Re: Strange output from "last" command

2001-03-21 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:39:39PM -0800, William R. Ward wrote: > date { Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in > date | Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in > I'm worried that the "date" entries are a consequence of > some h

Re: Strange output from "last" command

2001-03-21 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:39:39PM -0800, William R. Ward wrote: > date { Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in > date | Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in > I'm worried that the "date" entries are a consequence of > some

Re: kernel patches

2001-03-09 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 05:03:55PM +0100, Niklas H?glund wrote: > Hi! > Anyone know where I can find a kernel patch that restricts users so.. > 'who' shows only the user himself "who" is not a kernel function, it's a system utility. Something like this will work: alias who="me=`whoami`

Re: kernel patches

2001-03-09 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 05:03:55PM +0100, Niklas H?glund wrote: > Hi! > Anyone know where I can find a kernel patch that restricts users so.. > 'who' shows only the user himself "who" is not a kernel function, it's a system utility. Something like this will work: alias who="me=`whoami

Re: connecting to my box

2001-01-27 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 10:24:01AM -0600, Mohammed Elzubeir wrote: > > I just changed it and removed the last ':', and now I get "Permission > denied". Failing all else, SSH should ask you for a password if you have the server configured to allow this. In the SSH source code, in sshconne

Re: connecting to my box

2001-01-27 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 10:24:01AM -0600, Mohammed Elzubeir wrote: > > I just changed it and removed the last ':', and now I get "Permission > denied". Failing all else, SSH should ask you for a password if you have the server configured to allow this. In the SSH source code, in sshconn

Re: Need help analyzing firewall log message

2000-09-19 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 07:59:08PM +0200, Christian Pernegger wrote: > Sep 14 19:41:44 jesus kernel: Packet log: \ > input DENY eth1 PROTO=1 10.34.15.1:3 x.x.x.x:13 L=56 S=0x00 I=3405 F=0x > T=255 (#4) For ICMP protocol packets, the number following the source address should be the ICM

Re: Need help analyzing firewall log message

2000-09-19 Thread Robert Mognet
Hello, On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 07:59:08PM +0200, Christian Pernegger wrote: > Sep 14 19:41:44 jesus kernel: Packet log: \ > input DENY eth1 PROTO=1 10.34.15.1:3 x.x.x.x:13 L=56 S=0x00 I=3405 F=0x > T=255 (#4) For ICMP protocol packets, the number following the source address should be the IC