admittedly, i am not very familiar with sudo because i have never seen the
practical advantages of making su'ing more of a hassle by having to manage
another set of conf files and keeping track of who's a sudoer and,
therefore, have chosen not to use it.
what's to stop a person, once they've sudo'
admittedly, i am not very familiar with sudo because i have never seen the
practical advantages of making su'ing more of a hassle by having to manage
another set of conf files and keeping track of who's a sudoer and,
therefore, have chosen not to use it.
what's to stop a person, once they've sudo
> >Sounds like you've almost everything covered. About the only things I
> >could recommend would be to run nessus against yourself and install
> >snort in IDS mode.
> I could try that, I'd have to look up some info on the program. I assume
> nessus checks for known vulnerabilities? Sounds ok, neve
> >Sounds like you've almost everything covered. About the only things I
> >could recommend would be to run nessus against yourself and install
> >snort in IDS mode.
> I could try that, I'd have to look up some info on the program. I assume
> nessus checks for known vulnerabilities? Sounds ok, nev
Zak Kipling wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2001, Andres Herrera wrote:
>
> > I've tried to exploit it by login and sending:
> > ls ../*/../*/../*/../*/../*/../*/../*/../*/../*/../*/../
> > and suddenly it began eating memory and getting slow all the system.
> ...
> > Any solution??
>
> Resource limit
Zak Kipling wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2001, Andres Herrera wrote:
>
> > I've tried to exploit it by login and sending:
> > ls ../*/../*/../*/../*/../*/../*/../*/../*/../*/../*/../
> > and suddenly it began eating memory and getting slow all the system.
> ...
> > Any solution??
>
> Resource limi
well, considering that mac has cornered .0001% of the network
operating system market, there may be some truth to that statement.
after all, the most secure os is one that no one uses, right?
some one else, replied stating that a systems level of security is
generally at the knowledge/ski
well, considering that mac has cornered .0001% of the network
operating system market, there may be some truth to that statement.
after all, the most secure os is one that no one uses, right?
some one else, replied stating that a systems level of security is
generally at the knowledge/sk
8 matches
Mail list logo