ip's?! How can i do that?
> Thing
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Philipe Gaspar
Hey!
I'd like to know if somebody have used the string patch of iptables that filter
the packets according the "string" that the packet contains. And i'd like to
know how can i work with the packets on QUEUE that are passed to userspace !
--
Philipe Gaspar aka kr0n.
Hey!
I'd like to know if somebody have used the string patch of iptables that filter the
packets according the "string" that the packet contains. And i'd like to know how can
i work with the packets on QUEUE that are passed to userspace !
--
Philipe Gaspar aka kr0n.
Is the Squid Version 2.2.STABLE5 on Debian potato vulnerable?
If it is we need the new package with patches applied.
--
All my regards,
Philipe Gaspar
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is the Squid Version 2.2.STABLE5 on Debian potato vulnerable?
If it is we need the new package with patches applied.
--
All my regards,
Philipe Gaspar
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
is there a way to make the root password work for all users in
> certain apps.
Yes, you can use sudo, apt-get install sudo
> For instance, I would love to be able to make kscreensaver accept
> either the current user's password or the root password to unlock the
> screen.
so, is there a way to make the root password work for all users in
> certain apps.
Yes, you can use sudo, apt-get install sudo
> For instance, I would love to be able to make kscreensaver accept
> either the current user's password or the root password to unlock the
> screen.
can't
> change data .
>
you may try to change the content of package using netsed
> Samuele
--
Philipe Gaspar aka kr0n.
Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
can't
> change data .
>
you may try to change the content of package using netsed
> Samuele
--
Philipe Gaspar aka kr0n.
Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 11 February 2001 15:14, Adam Spickler wrote:
> After that, try doing an "apt-get upgrade". That should do it for ya!
Or a "apt-get -fu dist-upgrade" and these upgrades is not all time.
>
> ...adam
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 06:14:39PM +0100, Christian Schlettig wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
On Sunday 11 February 2001 00:28, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Ah, looking at my firewall I've got:
>
> -A output -s 127.0.0.1/255.0.0.0 -d 127.0.0.1/255.0.0.0 -p 17 -j ACCEPT
> -A output -s 127.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 -d 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -j REJECT -l
> -A output -s 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -d 127.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 -j REJE
On Sunday 11 February 2001 15:14, Adam Spickler wrote:
> After that, try doing an "apt-get upgrade". That should do it for ya!
Or a "apt-get -fu dist-upgrade" and these upgrades is not all time.
>
> ...adam
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 06:14:39PM +0100, Christian Schlettig wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
>
On Sunday 11 February 2001 00:28, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Ah, looking at my firewall I've got:
>
> -A output -s 127.0.0.1/255.0.0.0 -d 127.0.0.1/255.0.0.0 -p 17 -j ACCEPT
> -A output -s 127.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 -d 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -j REJECT -l
> -A output -s 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -d 127.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 -j REJ
On Thursday 08 February 2001 21:21, Rolf Kutz wrote:
> Wade Richards ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I've got a rescue CD with most of the packages on it, and most(*) of
> > those packages include MD5 sums for all the files.
> >
> > There should be a way to, after booting up on my rescue CD, check a
On Thursday 08 February 2001 21:21, Rolf Kutz wrote:
> Wade Richards ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I've got a rescue CD with most of the packages on it, and most(*) of
> > those packages include MD5 sums for all the files.
> >
> > There should be a way to, after booting up on my rescue CD, check
On Thursday 08 February 2001 03:19, Bradley M Alexander wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 05:12:48PM -0500, Matthias G. Imhof wrote:
> > Running lsof as root or various versions of netstat showed that
> > portsentry owns these ports :-)
>
> This is quite true. I remember now that I had the same issu
On Thursday 08 February 2001 03:19, Bradley M Alexander wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 05:12:48PM -0500, Matthias G. Imhof wrote:
> > Running lsof as root or various versions of netstat showed that
> > portsentry owns these ports :-)
>
> This is quite true. I remember now that I had the same iss
On Wednesday 07 February 2001 19:57, Tom Breza wrote:
> Maybe u r runnign portsentry?
I dont think so, portsentry opens more ports!
>
> siaraX
>
> > Performing strobe or nmap on my system, I get, e.g., the following list:
> >
> > 79/tcp openfinger
> > 119/tcpopennntp
> > 143
On Wednesday 07 February 2001 19:57, Tom Breza wrote:
> Maybe u r runnign portsentry?
I dont think so, portsentry opens more ports!
>
> siaraX
>
> > Performing strobe or nmap on my system, I get, e.g., the following list:
> >
> > 79/tcp openfinger
> > 119/tcpopennntp
> > 14
Hey,
What u mean debian-specific patch?
On Wednesday 10 January 2001 07:44, Ron Rademaker wrote:
> I know there's a debian package of lprng, but I don't know if the patch
> you're talking about is applied to this package, I guess you should check
> the changelog to find out.
>
> Ron Rademaker
>
>
Hey,
What u mean debian-specific patch?
On Wednesday 10 January 2001 07:44, Ron Rademaker wrote:
> I know there's a debian package of lprng, but I don't know if the patch
> you're talking about is applied to this package, I guess you should check
> the changelog to find out.
>
> Ron Rademaker
>
>
this is some strange
hour:/home/kr0n# cat /dev/urandom > /dev/fb0
bash: /dev/fb0: No such device
hour:/home/kr0n# ls -ls /dev/fb0
0 crw--w--w-1 root tty 29, 0 Jul 5 14:44 /dev/fb0
Ethan Benson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 10:09:23AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
So 0620 m
this is some strange
hour:/home/kr0n# cat /dev/urandom > /dev/fb0
bash: /dev/fb0: No such device
hour:/home/kr0n# ls -ls /dev/fb0
0 crw--w--w-1 root tty 29, 0 Jul 5 14:44 /dev/fb0
Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 10:09:23AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
>> So
23 matches
Mail list logo
