Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3148-1] chromium-browser end of life

2015-02-05 Thread Paul van der Vlis
oducts). With regards, Paul van der Vlis. -- Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer, Groningen http://www.vandervlis.nl/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3148-1] chromium-browser end of life

2015-02-05 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Hi Michael, Op 05-02-15 om 02:23 schreef Michael Gilbert: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: >>> The backports team expects backporters to have demonstrated competence >>> with the packages that they're planning to upload. Anyone considering

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3148-1] chromium-browser end of life

2015-02-04 Thread Paul van der Vlis
eweasel and Icedove. So far I know it was also not possible to have a year oldstable using backports. This is always a problem for me, because I have customers with complex desktop systems. With regards, Paul van der Vlis. -- Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer, Groningen http://www.vandervlis

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3148-1] chromium-browser end of life

2015-02-04 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Op 04-02-15 om 15:40 schreef Michael Gilbert: > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: >> I think it's a good idea to do a backport of the build-system after >> freeze-time of testing. Then we know what the new build-environment is >> for the c

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3148-1] chromium-browser end of life

2015-02-02 Thread Paul van der Vlis
e fast, but I am system administrator of complex installations with many desktop clients. I like to have some time for the upgrade. With regards, Paul van der Vlis. -- Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer, Groningen http://www.vandervlis.nl/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.de

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3148-1] chromium-browser end of life

2015-02-02 Thread Paul van der Vlis
I can understand that Michael does not have the time and motivation for such a backport, Chromium will take much time. But maybe others have. And there will be more packages with this problem, e.g. Iceweasel and Icedove. With regards, Paul van der Vlis. -- Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer

Re: Security updates realized by new releases, case for backports?

2013-10-04 Thread Paul van der Vlis
, but I also like stable on desktops. Backports is not used by default. Only when you ask explicitly for a backport you get it. Something like: apt-get -t squeeze-backports install ... See: http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/ An exception is when a package is only available in backports, or wh

Re: Security updates realized by new releases, case for backports?

2013-10-03 Thread Paul van der Vlis
t;? And BTW, I don't think they will brake the installation by using packages from backports. (...) With regards, Paul van der Vlis. -- Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer, Groningen http://www.vandervlis.nl/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org wit

Re: Security updates realized by new releases, case for backports?

2013-10-03 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Op 03-10-13 16:44, Marko Randjelovic schreef: > On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 14:37:22 +0200 Paul van der Vlis > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> In some cases security updates for packages in main are realized >> by new releases, e.g. Iceweasel and Wordpress. Such packa

Security updates realized by new releases, case for backports?

2013-10-03 Thread Paul van der Vlis
in main. I think it's common to take extra care with backports. Backports could be enabled by default in a new release, e.g. to have Iceweasel in a fresh install. What's your opinion? With regards, Paul van der Vlis. -- Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer, Groningen http

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1246-1] New OpenOffice.org packages fix arbitrary code execution

2007-01-08 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Martin Schulze schreef: > -- > Debian Security Advisory DSA 1246-1[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze > January 8th, 2007 http