I suppose since my install is so small this would be possible (just create
a bootable floppy that runs a script which uses dd to dump to the disk).
The problem I have now is that Ghost 2002 does not image ext3 correctly
(so after imaging, I have to convert the filesystems to ext3 again).
Suppose
I did this for my company, or something similar. We ship a security
information management solution, deliverables are a network appliance (the
"manager" node) and the client software. Anyway, we use debian as our
network appliance OS and I have "hardened" it and provided a very
restricted shell fo
I suppose since my install is so small this would be possible (just create
a bootable floppy that runs a script which uses dd to dump to the disk).
The problem I have now is that Ghost 2002 does not image ext3 correctly
(so after imaging, I have to convert the filesystems to ext3 again).
Suppos
I did this for my company, or something similar. We ship a security
information management solution, deliverables are a network appliance (the
"manager" node) and the client software. Anyway, we use debian as our
network appliance OS and I have "hardened" it and provided a very
restricted shell f
In your sshd_config you can use the Protocol directive.
Protocol
Specifies the protocol versions sshd should support. The possible
values are ``1'' and ``2''. Multiple versions must be comma-separated.
The default is ``2,1''.
-nicole
At 18:05 on May 13, Eduardo Gargiulo combined all the r
In your sshd_config you can use the Protocol directive.
Protocol
Specifies the protocol versions sshd should support. The possible
values are ``1'' and ``2''. Multiple versions must be comma-separated.
The default is ``2,1''.
-nicole
At 18:05 on May 13, Eduardo Gargiulo combined all the
This bug has been fixed in Mozilla upstream and will be included in the
1.0 release. You can dig in Bugtraq for more info.
-nicole
At 15:26 on May 8, Robert Millan combined all the right letters to say:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just noticed this advisory, stating a remote vulnerability
> in mozilla:
>
>
It doesn't look like a tcp wrappers problem to me. It looks like an SSH
problem. You might try restarting the SSH server, or maybe using only
SSHv1 (to see if it is working at all/accepting connections) with the
argument -1, or checking your /var/log/auth.log to see if there are any
SSH connection
It doesn't look like a tcp wrappers problem to me. It looks like an SSH
problem. You might try restarting the SSH server, or maybe using only
SSHv1 (to see if it is working at all/accepting connections) with the
argument -1, or checking your /var/log/auth.log to see if there are any
SSH connectio
force user = guest
force group = user
in your samba config for that share will force anything done to that share
to be done under that combination.
This isn't exactly what you asked, but it is useful. All this and more in
`man smb.conf` :o)
-nicole
At 03:53 on Jan 13, Stefan Srdic combined all
force user = guest
force group = user
in your samba config for that share will force anything done to that share
to be done under that combination.
This isn't exactly what you asked, but it is useful. All this and more in
`man smb.conf` :o)
-nicole
At 03:53 on Jan 13, Stefan Srdic combined al
You should have a "device" /dev/cdrom that is a symbolic link to your real
CDROM device (/dev/hdc?). This link should be owned by root:cdrom. You can
then add users to the cdrom group and they can then mount the CDROM. Same
for the floppy drive (with the "floppy" group, but you don't have to
symli
You should have a "device" /dev/cdrom that is a symbolic link to your real
CDROM device (/dev/hdc?). This link should be owned by root:cdrom. You can
then add users to the cdrom group and they can then mount the CDROM. Same
for the floppy drive (with the "floppy" group, but you don't have to
syml
Read this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-changes/2001/debian-changes-200111/msg00085.html
> What is the status with the wu-ftpd updated potato packages?
Read this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-changes/2001/debian-changes-200111/msg00085.html
> What is the status with the wu-ftpd updated potato packages?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can specify in your smb.conf a "hosts allow = " and "hosts deny = ".
This, with security = user (and only adding the valid users to your
smbpasswd file or using "valid users = ") and removing guest access from
your shares, should give you the level of security you want.
`man smb.conf`
-nicol
You can specify in your smb.conf a "hosts allow = " and "hosts deny = ".
This, with security = user (and only adding the valid users to your
smbpasswd file or using "valid users = ") and removing guest access from
your shares, should give you the level of security you want.
`man smb.conf`
-nico
I would suggest adding the testing source to your /etc/apt/sources.list
and grabbing kernel-source-2.2.19 (version 2.2.19.1-1 has the security
patches in question).
Edit /etc/apt/sources.list
Add deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ testing main
Save the file.
apt-get update
apt-get install kern
I would suggest adding the testing source to your /etc/apt/sources.list
and grabbing kernel-source-2.2.19 (version 2.2.19.1-1 has the security
patches in question).
Edit /etc/apt/sources.list
Add deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ testing main
Save the file.
apt-get update
apt-get install ker
We just went through this on this list, actually. If you are getting this
error, go into your browser settings and make sure you have the [en]
language in your accepted languages list.
-nicole
At 13:19 on Sep 30, Scott Henson combined all the right letters to say:
> looking on the debian site
We just went through this on this list, actually. If you are getting this
error, go into your browser settings and make sure you have the [en]
language in your accepted languages list.
-nicole
At 13:19 on Sep 30, Scott Henson combined all the right letters to say:
> looking on the debian site
At 00:26 on Sep 24, Will Aoki combined all the right letters to say:
>
> Mozilla's default language setting is only US English (en-us). My
> guess is that people getting 403s are running their browsers with
> out of the box language settings or have changed language settings
> but haven't listed
Actually it works in Netscape 4.77 but not Mozilla. So it doesn't look
like it's a server-side problem. That was my first guess, too. The
Forbidden error also does not have any mention of apache or any web
server for that matter.
The plot thickens :o)
-nicole
At 15:54 on Sep 24, Andrew Sione Taum
At 00:26 on Sep 24, Will Aoki combined all the right letters to say:
>
> Mozilla's default language setting is only US English (en-us). My
> guess is that people getting 403s are running their browsers with
> out of the box language settings or have changed language settings
> but haven't listed
Actually it works in Netscape 4.77 but not Mozilla. So it doesn't look
like it's a server-side problem. That was my first guess, too. The
Forbidden error also does not have any mention of apache or any web
server for that matter.
The plot thickens :o)
-nicole
At 15:54 on Sep 24, Andrew Sione Tau
?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a said:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 06:31:24PM -0700, Nicole Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> > Forbidden
> > You don't have permission to access /doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ on
> > this server.
> >
> > ??
>
> Works fine for
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ on
this server.
??
At 03:27 on Sep 24, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a combined all the right...:
> I am not sure everybody is aware of the "Securing Debian Manual"
> which can be found at
> http://www.debian
avier Fernández-Sanguino Peña said:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 06:31:24PM -0700, Nicole Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> > Forbidden
> > You don't have permission to access /doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ on
> > this server.
> >
> > ??
>
> Works fine for
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ on
this server.
??
At 03:27 on Sep 24, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña combined all the right...:
> I am not sure everybody is aware of the "Securing Debian Manual"
> which can be found at
> http://www.debia
> > last i used OpenBSD (2.6) it started portmap and identd by default at
> > the very least, maybe fingerd too i don't remember for sure.
> >
> The difference is, those were not exploitable.
And they are on debian?
Turning off services makes an excuse for the real problem -- software
needs to
> > last i used OpenBSD (2.6) it started portmap and identd by default at
> > the very least, maybe fingerd too i don't remember for sure.
> >
> The difference is, those were not exploitable.
And they are on debian?
Turning off services makes an excuse for the real problem -- software
needs to
I have not verified this problem, but the advisory looks quite decent.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:07:08 -0800 (PST)
From: David A. Gatwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SSH security vulnerability
I don't usually announ
I have not verified this problem, but the advisory looks quite decent.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:07:08 -0800 (PST)
From: David A. Gatwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SSH security vulnerability
I don't usually annou
33 matches
Mail list logo
