On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 06:35:11PM +0200, Weber wrote:
> https://igurublog.wordpress.com/2014/04/08/julian-assange-debian-is-owned-by-the-nsa/
>
Debunked, many times.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/454261872704094208?lang=en-gb
Neil
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 08:27:03AM -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > I take issue with this. I find this attitude really crappy. I'd strongly
> > invite you to reconsider this tone and belief.
>
> I invite you to jump back down to earth and
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 06:11:35PM -0400, Paul Henning wrote:
> Nope, not gonna do that. He can come right out and deny it himself, so it's
> on record. He's had weeks to do it and except for one personal reply has
> been tight lipped about it. Furthermore, I'm curious how that sabotage got
> by f
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 12:41:55PM +1300, Dale Allan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm afraid that spam has become such a problem that I have resorted to
> using Zerospam, and as a result, a recent email that you sent me has
> been quarantined.
>
I'm afraid that backscatter from this sort
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 09:05:54PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:57:53PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > NOTE: Users of etch/sid should upgrade to 1.3.0-16 *NOW*.
> >
>
> For users of etch, the fixed packages should be going in in two days. If
>
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:57:53PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> NOTE: Users of etch/sid should upgrade to 1.3.0-16 *NOW*.
>
For users of etch, the fixed packages should be going in in two days. If
it doesn't, I'll issue a DTSA.
Neil
--
[..] But, up to now, this Friday was the best Debconf day
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 08:31:09PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
> On 07/26/2006 08:27 PM, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> BTW, it is also reported as #380022:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380022
>
Sorry about this, th
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 10:52:34AM +0200, Matej Kovac wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:55:04AM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> > On 10 Jul 2006 18:23:26 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Je serai absent du bureau jusqu'au 13 juillet. Pour toute affaire
> > > urgente vous pouvez communiquer
I'm forwarding this over to debian-admin, as they're the people who can
fix this :)
Neil
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 10:57:06AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> First, not so serious, but still an error: All debian.org servers have
> a mismatch between the delegation and the served data, adding
> samosa.de
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 05:54:32PM +0100, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/security.php?issue=PMASA-2005-6 reports
> that sarge's phpmyadmin package has a security flaw which is occured only if
> "register_globals = on" setting is used.
>
> This feature is disabled i
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:11:42PM +0100, Jan Bakuwel wrote:
> Hoi all,
>
> Can someone please unsubscribe Mr Stephen Blacksapphire
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from the list? His automatic responses
> pollute the list unnecessarily.
>
Hi there,
I've emailed the [EMAIL PROTECTED], so I'm sure this'l
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 01:46:21PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hi Evgeni,
>
> Am 2005-08-22 12:39:02, schrieb Evgeni Golov:
>
> > The original message was no SPAM. If your filter has wiped it out, than
> > it's bad ;-)
>
> No ist not bad, becasue Anti-Anti-Virus messages ARE spam.
> I get p
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:13:15AM +0200, System Attendant wrote:
> ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange took action on the message. The message
> details were:
My finger on behalf of myself took action on the message. The message
details were:
> Sender = debian-security@lists.debian.org
> Recipient
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 09:02:47PM -0400, Daniel Sterling wrote:
> Keeping Debian stable by not changing things is great.
>
> Except maybe its not so great when you're trying to maintain a complicated,
> buggy, high profile program that handles sensitive user data and untrusted
> input.
>
> Debi
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 10:37:44AM -0500, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:14:05AM +0200, Sneferu wrote:
> >
> > Looks like there are a lot of false positives on it.
> >
>
> It looks like there are a lot of false positives with chkrootkit in
> general. Seriously, has anybody h
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 10:37:44AM -0500, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:14:05AM +0200, Sneferu wrote:
> >
> > Looks like there are a lot of false positives on it.
> >
>
> It looks like there are a lot of false positives with chkrootkit in
> general. Seriously, has anybody h
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:17:01PM +0100, Konstantin Filtschew wrote:
> security.debian.org seems to be down
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping security.debian.org
PING security.debian.org (130.89.175.33): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 130.89.175.33: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=68.8 ms
64 bytes from 130.89.175.33
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:17:01PM +0100, Konstantin Filtschew wrote:
> security.debian.org seems to be down
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping security.debian.org
PING security.debian.org (130.89.175.33): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 130.89.175.33: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=68.8 ms
64 bytes from 130.89.175.33
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 09:20:33AM -0200, Eduardo Almeida wrote:
>McAfee AVERT - Anti Virus Research, Analysis, and Outbreak Management
>visit us at www.avertlabs.com
CERT have also released an advisory:
http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA04-028A.html
Regards,
Neil McGovern
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 09:20:33AM -0200, Eduardo Almeida wrote:
>McAfee AVERT - Anti Virus Research, Analysis, and Outbreak Management
>visit us at www.avertlabs.com
CERT have also released an advisory:
http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA04-028A.html
Regards,
Neil McGovern
tant updates residing on that server.
>
> [...]
>
> PS: Yes, I've already tested apt-cacher ;->
>
How about apt-proxy?
HTH, HAND etc,
Neil McGovern
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li 8DEC67C5
tant updates residing on that server.
>
> [...]
>
> PS: Yes, I've already tested apt-cacher ;->
>
How about apt-proxy?
HTH, HAND etc,
Neil McGovern
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.t
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:28:26PM +0100, Thomas Horsten wrote:
> Who are mpuk and why are they censoring debian's mailing list, apparently
> from several different senders?
>
Bear in mind that tese message could simply be a result of spam.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of d
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:28:26PM +0100, Thomas Horsten wrote:
> Who are mpuk and why are they censoring debian's mailing list, apparently
> from several different senders?
>
Bear in mind that tese message could simply be a result of spam.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of d
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2003-21.html
Looks like GNU was root compromised.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li 8DEC67C5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2003-21.html
Looks like GNU was root compromised.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li 8DEC67C5
Taken from news://blueyonder.comp.linux -
> A friend of mine has his Debian box r00ted. It only seems to have been
> brought to his attention after seeing a file being wgetted and
> compiled
> within his Apache error log.
>
> He brought it to my attention as he originally suspected that there
>
Taken from news://blueyonder.comp.linux -
> A friend of mine has his Debian box r00ted. It only seems to have been
> brought to his attention after seeing a file being wgetted and
> compiled
> within his Apache error log.
>
> He brought it to my attention as he originally suspected that there
>
28 matches
Mail list logo
