Re: owner for /dev/vcsa*

2004-10-28 Thread Matthias Kestenholz
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 08:31 +0200, Frank Dietrich wrote: > Hi there, > > can I get into some failures when I change the owner for all /dev/vcsa > devices to an other user the root, e.g. vcsa? > > Background: The /usr/lib/mc/cons.saver needs read support for this > device. I will change owner for

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 561-1] New libxpm ...

2004-10-12 Thread Matthias Kestenholz
Hi On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 23:32 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dear Martin! > I think the upgrade of (I take out one as an example:) "twm" is a going-back > to an old version (?) - as the version numbers show ... > > - - - - - > I made an "apt-get update", then > kpackage entries looked like th

Re: unsubscribe

2003-04-15 Thread Matthias Kestenholz
* Laurent Luyckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 09:59, Fitzner, Michael wrote: > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > > > > Michael Fitzner > > System-Administration > > > > Jamba! AG > > Pfuelstrasse 5 > > 10997 Berlin > > Tel.: +49-30-

Re: SPAMMED ONCE AGIN !!! (Was: Re: Under 10 bucks, cell phone antenna boosters. qmnh coxehywqphhnsg)

2003-03-30 Thread Matthias Kestenholz
> Excuse me, I thought it was a security related List, and being spammed like > that doesn't look like a great securised system !!! > With a private list ONLY the SUBSCRIBED USERS could post on this list and > like that 99,99% of the spams would be rejected LIST-SERVER-SIDE !!! > And could you gi

Re: SPAMMED ONCE AGIN !!! (Was: Re: Under 10 bucks, cell phone antenna boosters. qmnh coxehywqphhnsg)

2003-03-30 Thread Matthias Kestenholz
* Bernard Lheureux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sunday 30 March 2003 16:03, wrote: > The previous one was a porono site promo, now this one !!! > WHY ISN'T THIS LIST PRIVATE ONLY !!! > 1. This has been discussed many times before. Search the archives. 2. Use spamassasin (i use procmail) as sp

Re: SPAMMED ONCE AGIN !!! (Was: Re: Under 10 bucks, cell phone antenna boosters. qmnh coxehywqphhnsg)

2003-03-30 Thread Matthias Kestenholz
> Excuse me, I thought it was a security related List, and being spammed like > that doesn't look like a great securised system !!! > With a private list ONLY the SUBSCRIBED USERS could post on this list and > like that 99,99% of the spams would be rejected LIST-SERVER-SIDE !!! > And could you gi

Re: SPAMMED ONCE AGIN !!! (Was: Re: Under 10 bucks, cell phone antenna boosters. qmnh coxehywqphhnsg)

2003-03-30 Thread Matthias Kestenholz
* Bernard Lheureux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sunday 30 March 2003 16:03, wrote: > The previous one was a porono site promo, now this one !!! > WHY ISN'T THIS LIST PRIVATE ONLY !!! > 1. This has been discussed many times before. Search the archives. 2. Use spamassasin (i use procmail) as sp