What's chroot ?
What's chroot ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Stark wrote:
> You wouldn't actually imply that hackers are out their providing a
> welcome service do you? I can see if you asked for your network to
> be stress tested, but to go as far as saying they provide a welcome
> service? Come on! Yeah, they might have found a security w
Daniel Stark wrote:
You wouldn't actually imply that hackers are out their providing a
welcome service do you? I can see if you asked for your network to
be stress tested, but to go as far as saying they provide a welcome
service? Come on! Yeah, they might have found a security whole, bu
Are there any gpl or similar anti-virus programs for linux ?
Any reccomendations ?
GBY
It may get too heavy to not mirror the security update packages.
Why don't we put signature verification into apt and dpkg and mirror
everything ?
And perhaps have a tool that checks a bunch of known mirrors for
discrepencies in the keyring packages ?
And have a single URL, location aware,
Are there any gpl or similar anti-virus programs for linux ?
Any reccomendations ?
GBY
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It may get too heavy to not mirror the security update packages.
Why don't we put signature verification into apt and dpkg and mirror
everything ?
And perhaps have a tool that checks a bunch of known mirrors for
discrepencies in the keyring packages ?
And have a single URL, location aware, lo
Steve Rudd wrote:
Hi Steve,
It's not just the kernel that can get hacked. Is it Linux 7 or Redhat 7
? (I'm pretty sure it's Redhat 7).
Anyway, I'm pretty new to Debian and Linux so anyone please feel free to
correct me.
An example of the different methodologies between Redhat and Debian: t
Steve Rudd wrote:
Hi Steve,
It's not just the kernel that can get hacked. Is it Linux 7 or Redhat 7
? (I'm pretty sure it's Redhat 7).
Anyway, I'm pretty new to Debian and Linux so anyone please feel free to
correct me.
An example of the different methodologies between Redhat and Debian: the
I ran apt-setup and it automatically added my local mirrors. I'm not sure if
it wipes your previous sources.list though...
GBY
I ran apt-setup and it automatically added my local mirrors. I'm not sure if
it wipes your previous sources.list though...
GBY
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just wanted to bring this to that attention of those who care...
Because there were quite a few insecure temp file creation reports a while
ago, perhaps some of us should use this tool to find more ASAP.
It was in the fresh meat mailing list:
---
Who is the list maintainer ?
GBY
I just wanted to bring this to that attention of those who care...
Because there were quite a few insecure temp file creation reports a while
ago, perhaps some of us should use this tool to find more ASAP.
It was in the fresh meat mailing list:
--
Who is the list maintainer ?
GBY
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What about having a nightly email out of updates (with GPG) for those that
really need them and charging the subscribers (except contributors)?
I would imagine corporate sites subscribing.
That way there'll be more bandwidth for the developers, and the income can
be used for the Debian project.
> I think that has a lot to do with the fact that they don't explicitly say
> to run something else, or give a URI for a different mail client. A news
> story that said, "... your email is insecure ... run this to make it
better
> http://debian.org/ :)", might get some people using non-outlook, e
What about having a nightly email out of updates (with GPG) for those that
really need them and charging the subscribers (except contributors)?
I would imagine corporate sites subscribing.
That way there'll be more bandwidth for the developers, and the income can
be used for the Debian project.
> I think that has a lot to do with the fact that they don't explicitly say
> to run something else, or give a URI for a different mail client. A news
> story that said, "... your email is insecure ... run this to make it
better
> http://debian.org/ :)", might get some people using non-outlook,
> 1) Because the vast majority of users are completely ignorant of security
> issues, or simply don't care.
It's true, I worked for a company that made an email client, which shipped
with a service, the client is for portable use (like hotmail) but not web
based.
The program runs off the floppy,
> 1) Because the vast majority of users are completely ignorant of security
> issues, or simply don't care.
It's true, I worked for a company that made an email client, which shipped
with a service, the client is for portable use (like hotmail) but not web
based.
The program runs off the floppy,
You gave me a brain wave :)
Perhaps email security having four stages:
1 MIME
2 SSL
3 SSL + Encrypted storage on mail server
4 PGP/GPG/S-MIME
I don't think anyone offers number 3.
I heard there was a PGP like WEB mail service where they generate your
private key for you and store it on there se
You gave me a brain wave :)
Perhaps email security having four stages:
1 MIME
2 SSL
3 SSL + Encrypted storage on mail server
4 PGP/GPG/S-MIME
I don't think anyone offers number 3.
I heard there was a PGP like WEB mail service where they generate your
private key for you and store it on there s
> Is it not normal for nameservers to "talk" to each other?
> Or are nameservers only supposed to "talk" to their listed forwarders?
Perhaps your server is listed as a up-stream server for someone elses server
?
> What about [A-M].ROOT-SERVERS.NET?
DNS servers are only supposed to talk to their
> Is it not normal for nameservers to "talk" to each other?
> Or are nameservers only supposed to "talk" to their listed forwarders?
Perhaps your server is listed as a up-stream server for someone elses server
?
> What about [A-M].ROOT-SERVERS.NET?
DNS servers are only supposed to talk to their
26 matches
Mail list logo
