Hello Matthew,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:34:32PM -0700, Matthew Whitworth wrote:
> I have a dual-homed host spanning two networks and I would like to leave
> one of its interfaces unconfigured so that I can use libpcap
> applications on that network unobserved. I can do this using the
> comma
Hello Matthew,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:34:32PM -0700, Matthew Whitworth wrote:
> I have a dual-homed host spanning two networks and I would like to leave
> one of its interfaces unconfigured so that I can use libpcap
> applications on that network unobserved. I can do this using the
> comma
On Wednesday 14 May 2003 04:17 pm, Stewart James wrote:
> Hi all,
Hello Stewart,
> My manager just came in asking questions about sudo. We use sudo here as a
> replacement for hacing to know root passwords - in general there are
> around 5 of us who need root access to the machines we maintain. w
On Tuesday 13 May 2003 06:11 am, Peter Holm wrote:
> Did I something wrong? Or is this exploit, if not for a root shell,
> still good for a local DOS?
Yes, any user on any system may use all of the available CPU time unless the
administrator has placed limits on them doing so. Presumably the exp
On Thursday 08 May 2003 03:30 am, Rudolph van Graan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rolf Kutz wrote:
> > apt-listchanges. It displays the new changelog
> > entries from the debs before installing them, but
> > has to download them first, so no bandwidth
> > saving.
>
> This is almost exactly what I looked for - i
Sorry for the duplicate. I seem to be about 3 hours behind on email delivery.
- Keegan
On Wednesday 23 April 2003 07:17 am, David Ramsden wrote:
> I'm building a 'secure' server.
> I downloaded the 2.4.20 kernel source from kernel.org and patched with
> grsecurity (latest patch).
> I also disabled loadable modules or any module support in the kernel for
> added security - So everythi
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 01:07 pm, Ian Garrison wrote:
>Imo iptables is a reasonably good stateful firewall and is fine in most
> cases. However, a very wise person once said that the ideal setup is to
> layer more than one implementation of packet filter and firewall between
> the wild and
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 01:07 pm, Ian Garrison wrote:
>Imo iptables is a reasonably good stateful firewall and is fine in most
> cases. However, a very wise person once said that the ideal setup is to
> layer more than one implementation of packet filter and firewall between
> the wild and
Hello,
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 11:44 am, Jones wrote:
> I am planning to replace a (dead) Windows 2000 computer that was used
> as a web server and email server with a Debian Linux solution. This
> machine is connected to the net via DSL and would run apache and
> exim/qpopper and sshd. Every
Hello,
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 11:44 am, Jones wrote:
> I am planning to replace a (dead) Windows 2000 computer that was used
> as a web server and email server with a Debian Linux solution. This
> machine is connected to the net via DSL and would run apache and
> exim/qpopper and sshd. Every
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 04:13 pm, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> Hi
Hello,
> A friend just asked me this question and I got curious. say I'm equipped
> with a linux laptop and some knowledge, I can walk into a company that uses
> NIS, find out the settings (NISDOMAIN, free ip address, etc...) and join
>
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 04:13 pm, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> Hi
Hello,
> A friend just asked me this question and I got curious. say I'm equipped
> with a linux laptop and some knowledge, I can walk into a company that uses
> NIS, find out the settings (NISDOMAIN, free ip address, etc...) and join
>
13 matches
Mail list logo