-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Dietsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: RPC: Remote system error \
>>- Connection refused
>>
>> The same an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jean Christophe ANDRÉ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm écrivait :
>> The same answer as a luser and as a root. What should I deduct from
>> this? It's just so weird as I'm not running NFS, NIS or any other
>&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noah L. Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:15:08PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>> The same answer as a luser and as a root. What should I deduct from
>> this? It's just so weird as I'm no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Dietsche wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: RPC: Remote system error \
>>- Connection refused
>>
>> The same answer as a luser and as a r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jean Christophe ANDRÃ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm écrivait :
>> The same answer as a luser and as a root. What should I deduct from
>> this? It's just so weird as I'm not running NFS, NIS or any other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noah L. Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:15:08PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>> The same answer as a luser and as a root. What should I deduct from
>> this? It's just so weird as I'm no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Dietsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111
>> from within my own system? Should I be concerned? Should I expe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Grape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 15 Oct 2002, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>> Still, the connection attempt from localhost to port 111 puzzles me...
>
> Of the top of my head: Do you have any nfs services running on the
> mach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Dietsche wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111
>> from within my own system? Should I be concerned? Should I expect
>> the worst?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Grape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 15 Oct 2002, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>> Still, the connection attempt from localhost to port 111 puzzles me...
>
> Of the top of my head: Do you have any nfs services running on the
> mach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 0, Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111
>
> Good afternoon (from Australia). It's a beautiful,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111 from
> within my own system? Should I be concerned? Should I expect the worst?
> Any insight on this issue would calm m
1 from
within my own system? Should I be concerned? Should I expect the worst?
Any insight on this issue would calm me down...
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://erppimaa.ihku.org/> | <0x1410081E>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9q6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 0, Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111
>
> Good afternoon (from Australia). It's a beautiful,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111 from
> within my own system? Should I be concerned? Should I expect the worst?
> Any insight on this issue would calm m
1 from
within my own system? Should I be concerned? Should I expect the worst?
Any insight on this issue would calm me down...
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://erppimaa.ihku.org/> | <0x1410081E>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9q6
dn't quite understand what you mean. What problem did
you have? It may be "the language barrier", but I just couldn't
comprehend correctly of what you say above. I apologize, but could you
rephrase?
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://erppimaa.ihku.org/&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> base-passwd which got upgraded yesterday, works just fine here. It
>> added one new group, though, which I'm concerned of because
dn't quite understand what you mean. What problem did
you have? It may be "the language barrier", but I just couldn't
comprehend correctly of what you say above. I apologize, but could you
rephrase?
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://erppimaa.ihku.org/&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> base-passwd which got upgraded yesterday, works just fine here. It
>> added one new group, though, which I'm concerned of because
a few rough edges
> which could affect 'su'.
I'm running roughly 90% testing and 10% unstable system, and the
base-passwd which got upgraded yesterday, works just fine here. It
added one new group, though, which I'm concerned of because I don't
know what this group is
390 root3u IPv4579 TCP erpland:783 (LISTEN)
So, I guess this is the tool you were looking for.
> Thank you,
HTH!
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://erppimaa.ihku.org/> | <0x1410081E>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/L
a few rough edges
> which could affect 'su'.
I'm running roughly 90% testing and 10% unstable system, and the
base-passwd which got upgraded yesterday, works just fine here. It
added one new group, though, which I'm concerned of because I don't
know what this group is
390 root3u IPv4579 TCP erpland:783 (LISTEN)
So, I guess this is the tool you were looking for.
> Thank you,
HTH!
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://erppimaa.ihku.org/> | <0x1410081E>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/L
y Peek, O'Reilly and
Loukides) is worth mentioning. IMHO, it's a great book -- very nice
and easy to read. It has taught me one thing or another; gets my
recommendation, for what it's worth...
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://erppimaa.ihku.org
y Peek, O'Reilly and
Loukides) is worth mentioning. IMHO, it's a great book -- very nice
and easy to read. It has taught me one thing or another; gets my
recommendation, for what it's worth...
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://erppimaa.ihku.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Mail Delivery Error
| To: Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| No such user: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And I'm very much sure, that all of my mails I've sent to
debian-security@lists.debian.org - so, something's broken in
lists.debian.org end? Or am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcel Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jussi Ekholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I was just wondering about the policy, in general - too. Are the
>> "official" Debian packages created with MD5 check
olicy, in general - too. Are the
"official" Debian packages created with MD5 checksum file, as well? And
does ``debsums'' work in conjunction with apt, so it would check the
package and checksum file before apt installs it? As I said, just
mapping my options here...
- --
Jussi Ekh
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've seen some of the discussion about OpenSSL and it's holes, remot
Topic had a mindo, sorry about that. OpenSSL was what I wrote about. :-)
--
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
pgpAIVkysUEW8.p
if I forgot something please spank me and I'll be glad
to fill in the caps. :-)
Argh, what a rant...
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9SZvfAtEARxQQCB4RAoQgAJ9W1zBn0sHH2QKJYB3JBTZKQ8oFoQCePF6M
I0cAnX1/hJCcpYpcraWHXTA=
=75c8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
ke
debian-security - so what? Quit whining and do something about it. Tune
up Procmail & SpamAssassin and you don't have to tolerate spam anymore.
Or is this some sort of "question of principle"? If so... *shrug*
That's all I wanted to say.
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTEC
place or otherwise things aren't ok - at least, if we're
talking about spam. :-)
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9IWdJAtEARxQQCB4RAoNKAJ9BEMN7VIBqoVCiNkEsv9Yt742bcgCfYAcS
5Cr
the server with SSH.com to instantly move
using OpenSSH. :-)
Thanks for your reply; I haven't been studying SSH as a protocol, or
different SSH's, so my knowledge ain't very huge...
> Take a look at http://www.ssh.com/faq/index.cfm?id=1243
> for public key interop
Tha
putting key there, too, but still no success. I'm completely out
of ideas...
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9HXtUAtEARxQQCB4RApNDAKCtJZKro5SEb3YcRpen3duBMixUSgCfQkZj
YtxjWEC+O0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Replying to myself, sorry - just trying to provide extra information)
> Dietmar Goldbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 02:20:20AM -0500, Rob VanFleet wrote:
>&
up the FILES section of SSH2(1),
for no avail.
> Try generating new keys for protocol 2 with "ssh-keygen -d",
> copy them with "ssh-copy-id" and try again.
What does option '-d' for ssh-keygen do? My ssh-keygen doesn't even know
it; or at least '
r someone else logs into my system.
Let me know, if you find out *why* PAM is throwing that insult if
'noenv' option is enabled...
--
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.cjb.net/
pgpr8WRXitsJM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
answer. But I guess it's nothing serious -- of course, fixing it would
be still nice and appropriate.
Any hints are highly appreciated.
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU/Linux user number 269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | GnuPG Public Key ID: 1410081E
-BEGIN PGP SI
, I guess it's not that
big deal, but at least I consider it as a Bad Thing. As you say,
top-posting usually leads to very excessive quoting and either way, IMHO
it's much harder to read a mail upside down.
> thanks for the required_hits tip. next time i try SA, i'll read
> thro
, I guess it's not that
big deal, but at least I consider it as a Bad Thing. As you say,
top-posting usually leads to very excessive quoting and either way, IMHO
it's much harder to read a mail upside down.
> thanks for the required_hits tip. next time i try SA, i'll read
> thro
d_hits = x' in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs, where 'x' is
maybe 5 or something else. This makes SA to stop processing mails
further than hits you just specified.
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU/Linux user number 269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/
d_hits = x' in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs, where 'x' is
maybe 5 or something else. This makes SA to stop processing mails
further than hits you just specified.
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU/Linux user number 269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/
railing slash to that URL,
if it would help? Pretty weird indeed, because I just pasted that URL
I wrote and am looking at the page right now...
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU/Linux user number 269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | ICQ UIN: 156057281
ekh on IRCnet | GnuPG Public Key ID: 1410081E
pgpkf1EITRh9w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ive it up for any price. It has let only *one* spam
through, and it haven't catched any legitimate mail.
If you don't want any spam, it's up to *you*. I recommend visiting
http://www.spamassassin.org > and setting it up. My spam
problems have ended after installing it.
--
Jus
ive it up for any price. It has let only *one* spam
through, and it haven't catched any legitimate mail.
If you don't want any spam, it's up to *you*. I recommend visiting
http://www.spamassassin.org > and setting it up. My spam
problems have ended after installing it.
--
Jus
A.J. Rossini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "jussi" == Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What software tries to connect to port 16001?
>
> GNOME.
Yeah, it was gconfd which was doing that. It just made me wonder,
because I've used Galeon a mill
om your scripts, I will rip 'em. ;-) Thanks a lot,
I think these help a bit, at least. Still, most of the iptables
syntax is total hebrew for me... I guess my IQ isn't very high.
*sad grin*.
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | registered Linux user #269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.ne
A.J. Rossini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "jussi" == Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What software tries to connect to port 16001?
>
> GNOME.
Yeah, it was gconfd which was doing that. It just made me wonder,
because I've used Galeon a mill
om your scripts, I will rip 'em. ;-) Thanks a lot,
I think these help a bit, at least. Still, most of the iptables
syntax is total hebrew for me... I guess my IQ isn't very high.
*sad grin*.
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | registered Linux user #269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.ne
27.0.0.1]
What software tries to connect to port 16001? Or does anything? What
should I think about this entry? I admit, I'm *overly* paranoid, when
it comes to running services on my own computer. Any input is
appreciated, and the faster, the better. :-)
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECT
27.0.0.1]
What software tries to connect to port 16001? Or does anything? What
should I think about this entry? I admit, I'm *overly* paranoid, when
it comes to running services on my own computer. Any input is
appreciated, and the faster, the better. :-)
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECT
I modify in it to gain as great security as
possible? I know, that there's HOWTO's for these, and I've read those,
of course. But now I'd want to ask first-hand opinion about my iptables
rule file. Is it secure, or what should I do in order to make it more
secure?
--
Jussi
harm to other people online. Was it a take-over of
an IRC channel, breaking to someone's system or whatever. I just
hate these people. I've never seen computer, internet connection and
everything related as a tools to cause harm and destruction. It's
beyond me, what satis
harm to other people online. Was it a take-over of
an IRC channel, breaking to someone's system or whatever. I just
hate these people. I've never seen computer, internet connection and
everything related as a tools to cause harm and destruction. It's
beyond me, what satis
d, that
I'm almost taking the power off of my computer or at least shutting
down all services...
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | registered Linux user #269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | UIN (ICQ):156057281
ekh @ IRCNet | GnuPG Public Key ID: 1410081E
pgplXJXeHJGTz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
d, that
I'm almost taking the power off of my computer or at least shutting
down all services...
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | registered Linux user #269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | UIN (ICQ):156057281
ekh @ IRCNet | GnuPG Public Key ID: 1410081E
msg06352/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ures? What should I do in order to not see them in
logs anymore?
--
Jussi Ekholm, "Everything is so fine it could be
a spineless jelly. don't let your mind take you in misery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]all the feelings you're not so much pleased
http://ekh
ures? What should I do in order to not see them in
logs anymore?
--
Jussi Ekholm, "Everything is so fine it could be
a spineless jelly. don't let your mind take you in misery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] all the feelings you're not so much pleased
http://ekh
message
here - please try to bear me. I'm still thinking of subscribing to
debian-user, but I already have so goddamn many mailing lists where I've
been subscribed to, not to even mention newsgroups - I just don't have
time to read my current subscribings, not to speak of a new one, a
re - please try to bear me. I'm still thinking of subscribing to
debian-user, but I already have so goddamn many mailing lists where I've
been subscribed to, not to even mention newsgroups - I just don't have
time to read my current subscribings, not to speak of a new one, and even
v
your trash. Do us a favour, will you? And for the
second; you will keep getting 80 messages a day, as you say, if you don't
resign for yourself.
--
Jussi Ekholm,"Everything is so fine it could be
the ill flowerdon't let your mind take you in misery
[EMA
your trash. Do us a favour, will you? And for the
second; you will keep getting 80 messages a day, as you say, if you don't
resign for yourself.
--
Jussi Ekholm,"Everything is so fine it could be
the ill flowerdon't let your mind take you in misery
[
63 matches
Mail list logo
