On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 08:39:28PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Jonathan McDowell , 2014-12-12, 16:46:
> >>Yeah, and it should probably be added to stable-updates.
>
> +1
>
> >That causes problems with verifying signatures from keys that were
> >valid at
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:20:12AM -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:17:25 +0100, Sébastien NOBILI
> said:
> > Hi, Le jeudi 11 décembre 2014 à 21:46, Hubert Chathi a écrit :
> >> On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:28:32 -0800, Jeremie Marguerie
> >> said: > I guess there might/should be
>
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:50:48PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 07:32:47AM -0500, Simon Valiquette wrote:
> > So here are my questions:
> >
> > 1. Do both keys are still valid?
> >
> > 2. If the key F2E861A3 is legitimate (which I think it is because
> > I have a trust pa
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 01:29:00PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> I'm trying to remove a couple of obsolete email addresses from my GPG key.
>
> Using the "deluid" command available after running "gpg --edit-key" works
> successfully. But once I upload my modified key to various keyservers I
>
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:54:33PM +0200, Adam ENDRODI wrote:
> How widely do you think changing the MAC address of a NIC via
> ``ifconfig hw'' is supported by the various network cards
> and drivers out there nowadays?
My experience is that everything I've tried it with has worked;
certainly I
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:54:33PM +0200, Adam ENDRODI wrote:
> How widely do you think changing the MAC address of a NIC via
> ``ifconfig hw'' is supported by the various network cards
> and drivers out there nowadays?
My experience is that everything I've tried it with has worked;
certainly I
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 09:46:13AM -0400, John Keimel wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 03:17:56PM +0300, Ted Bukov wrote:
> > I got the last 2.4.20 kernel with apt-get install. I want to patch
> > it with grsec, but I met many times the follow message: "Reversed
> > (or previously applied) patch de
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:49:37AM -0700, Anne Carasik wrote:
> This one time, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
> > But, is there a fairly populated pgp keyserver besides
> > wwwkeys.pgp.net?
> Here's a whole slew listed at:
>
> http://www.openpgp.net/pgpsrv.html
Or:
http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris
[Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header; I read the list]
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 03:37:50PM +0200, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
> Jonathan McDowell wrote/napisa³[a]/schrieb:
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 07:12:09PM +0200, Michal Tarana wrote:
> &
[Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header; I read the list]
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 03:37:50PM +0200, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
> Jonathan McDowell wrote/napisa³[a]/schrieb:
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 07:12:09PM +0200, Michal Tarana wrote:
> &
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 07:12:09PM +0200, Michal Tarana wrote:
> I made my gpg signature with gpg tool in Woody and everything was O.K.
> until I wanted to send it to some keyserver. I tried few servers from
> www.keyserver.net, but everytime I got only this answer:
>
> gpg: error sending to 'ww
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 07:12:09PM +0200, Michal Tarana wrote:
> I made my gpg signature with gpg tool in Woody and everything was O.K.
> until I wanted to send it to some keyserver. I tried few servers from
> www.keyserver.net, but everytime I got only this answer:
>
> gpg: error sending to 'w
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:17:42PM +0200, Alex Snijder wrote:
> I'm looking for a good 'secure' FTP server. Standard the wu-ftp server
> is installed but everyone is telling me it's full with holes. Does
> anyone know a good non anonymous I can use? I'm currently using
> proftpd.
I'm running vs
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:17:42PM +0200, Alex Snijder wrote:
> I'm looking for a good 'secure' FTP server. Standard the wu-ftp server
> is installed but everyone is telling me it's full with holes. Does
> anyone know a good non anonymous I can use? I'm currently using
> proftpd.
I'm running v
14 matches
Mail list logo