* James Barrett wrote:
> Unsubscribe me or I will spam your list
You're already doing that...
* Nikolay Hristov wrote:
> On 10/01/2014 02:58 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> >On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 14:45:55 +0300
> >Nikolay Hristov wrote:
> >
> >>>I made lenny packages for my machines. I could share them if you
> >>>want?
> >[...]
> >>Which part of "I don't want to use deb packages from diff
* Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> As discussed on debian-release some time ago security support
> for openjdk will be following upstream releases in the future.
>
> The packages for openjdk are generally ready, but I don't use
> Java myself. As such I need some additional real world testing
> before
* Thomas Hungenberg wrote:
> Piotr Drozdek wrote:
> > I don't have any packages with 'id' status in my system. I don't know
> > what they mean. Maybe somebody can help?
>
> I think 'd' marks packages for deletion?
> However, I have not requested to delete all these packages.
>
> > But - to resol
* Thomas Hungenberg wrote:
> Piotr Drozdek wrote:
> > Show me results of
> > apt-cache policy tex-common
>
> tex-common:
> Installed: 2.08
> Candidate: 2.08.1
> Version table:
> 2.08.1 0
> 500 http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates/main i386 Packages
> *** 2.08 0
>
* Thiemo Nagel wrote:
> Dear Johannes,
>
> On 01/22/2010 11:27 PM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>> A typical Debian upgrade will lead to
>> a downtime on the order of a few minutes once every 2 years, compared to
>> tedious manual reinstallation required on other systems. It is
>> straightforward to
* Thiemo Nagel wrote:
> Dear Michael,
>
> Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> it already seems hard enough with the current level of manpower to
>> support two releases at the same time let alone three. it may be
>> doable, but the security team would need more volunteers (particularly
>> those interested
* m...@firstfloor.org wrote:
> hello
>
> after updateing wget on
>
> Linux version 2.6.26-2-686 (Debian 2.6.26-19) Lenny
>
> i received a waring from rkhunter:
>
> Warning: The file properties have changed:
> File: /usr/bin/wget
> Current hash: 2d5d175c449eecfda43401a7a66b8a3
* Andreas Kretschmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> am Thu, dem 12.06.2008, um 4:28:52 +0200 mailte Stefan Ramahi folgendes:
> > XING - Powering Relationships
> >
> >
> > Guten Tag,
> >
> > ich möchte Sie gerne in mein XING-Netzwerk einladen!
>
> Sowas an eine Mailingliste? Das ist, sorry, aso
* Andrew McGlashan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>>
>> Affected keys include SSH keys, OpenVPN keys, DNSSEC keys, and key
>> material for use in X.509 certificates and session keys used in
>> SSL/TLS connections. Keys generated with GnuPG or GNUTLS are
>> not affected,
* Dimitar Dobrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi group,
>
>
> are there updates for this issue for old stable - sarge?
You should read what you quote:
> The first vulnerable version, 0.9.8c-1, was uploaded to the unstable
> distribution on 2006-09-17, and has since propagated to the testing
> and
* Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jens Schüßler:
>
> >> Not in our tests. Are you sure you're running the new kernel? What
> >> does "uname -a" say?
>
> > $uname -a
> > Linux algol 2.6.18+2008-02-12 #1 Tue Feb 12 16:49:
* Michel Messerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:18:30PM +0100, Jens Schüßler wrote:
> > * Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Not in our tests. Are you sure you're running the new kernel? What
> > > does &
* Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jens Schüßler:
>
> > I just upgraded my linux-source-2.6.18 to 2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1_all and
> > build a new linux-image. But after installing an rebooting I still was
> > able to become root with this exploit:
> &
I just upgraded my linux-source-2.6.18 to 2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1_all and
build a new linux-image. But after installing an rebooting I still was
able to become root with this exploit:
http://milw0rm.com/exploits/5092
Can anyone reproduce this?
Jens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Johannes Graumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The machine I'm running tiger on gets its ntp server via dynamic dhcp and
> therefore that changes regularly ...
> I was wondering whether it is admissible to use wildcards in
> /etc/tiger/templates/check_listeningprocs.out.template
* Frédéric PICA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your answer,
>
> So I need to do an apt-get dist-upgrade in my cron job to be sure to always
> have the latest security fixes ?
> What's the risk to have a needed package uninstalled by that way ?
You could use the package cron-apt for this,
17 matches
Mail list logo
