On vr, 2014-05-30 at 10:53 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:46:12AM +1000, Alfie John wrote:
> >Sorry for asking questions.
>
> Don't apologize for asking questions, it's perfectly reasonable to do so
> and you'll find that many people in debian are more than happy to answ
On Fri, April 29, 2005 1:42, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña said:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 10:04:00PM +0200, Hans Spaans wrote:
>> Is this going to solve the problems? Don't get me wrong, because I love
>> your goal but I don't believe that what you suggesting right now
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Hey!
>
> What do people on this list think about fixing PHP include files in a
> DSA that are accessible via HTTP as well and contain one bug or
> another as they are not supposed to be accessible via HTTP but
> accidently are.
Patching them like Squirrelmail has fixed thi
On Sunday 01 February 2004 16:21, Dale Amon wrote:
> I'd still be interested to know if anyone knows *why*
> so many people are doing this. I know what they are doing;
> I can block it; but I'm curious. I've got a gut feeling
> it has something to do with spammers hiding their tracks,
> but I'm no
On Sunday 01 February 2004 16:21, Dale Amon wrote:
> I'd still be interested to know if anyone knows *why*
> so many people are doing this. I know what they are doing;
> I can block it; but I'm curious. I've got a gut feeling
> it has something to do with spammers hiding their tracks,
> but I'm no
On Sunday 01 February 2004 14:50, Dale Amon wrote:
> Actually that's precisely how I discovered it. I added
> allow queries and was trying to figure out why I was
> denying so many queries per second.
You added it globally and to every zone? Also allow-transfer is a nice
own to get into place. Bu
On Sunday 01 February 2004 14:50, Dale Amon wrote:
> Actually that's precisely how I discovered it. I added
> allow queries and was trying to figure out why I was
> denying so many queries per second.
You added it globally and to every zone? Also allow-transfer is a nice
own to get into place. Bu
On Sunday 01 February 2004 14:02, Dale Amon wrote:
> What is the purpose of a DNS query NS ? It returns
> to the requester my list of root servers, which seems
> pointless... and I am getting hit by them at the rate
> of several a second from various nameservers.
'dig . ns @ > /etc/bind/db.root' c
On Sunday 01 February 2004 14:02, Dale Amon wrote:
> What is the purpose of a DNS query NS ? It returns
> to the requester my list of root servers, which seems
> pointless... and I am getting hit by them at the rate
> of several a second from various nameservers.
'dig . ns @ > /etc/bind/db.root' c
On Sunday 30 November 2003 06:42, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've always avoided the # character, because I read in a book way
> back when I first got into Unix that you shouldn't use this
> character. Recently, a friend had issues logging in via KDM using a
> password with a # in it, that
On Sunday 30 November 2003 06:42, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've always avoided the # character, because I read in a book way
> back when I first got into Unix that you shouldn't use this
> character. Recently, a friend had issues logging in via KDM using a
> password with a # in it, that
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 11:27:16AM +0200, Tim van Erven wrote:
> On Wed, 07/05/2003 07:40 +0200, Hans Spaans wrote:
> >
> > How are you going to handle firewalls and stuff? This because you need
> > to accept traffic for those ports.
>
> You always need to let the tr
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 01:14:04AM +0200, Tim van Erven wrote:
> On Tue, 06/05/2003 13:07 -0500, Mark Edgington wrote:
> > incorporate functionality into inetd/xinetd/rinetd which listens for a
> > predefined sequence of connection attempts on certain ports. Upon noticing
> > the correct sequenc
On Wednesday 22 August 2001 02:53, A. Didit Mifanto wrote:
> I'm using proftpd 1.2.0pre10-2.0potato1, tried this vulnerability,
> and still affects to this version of proftpd. I see that
> ftp://ftp.debian.org is still using this version, and I think also
> affected.
Add this line to global and t
On Wednesday 22 August 2001 02:53, A. Didit Mifanto wrote:
> I'm using proftpd 1.2.0pre10-2.0potato1, tried this vulnerability,
> and still affects to this version of proftpd. I see that
> ftp://ftp.debian.org is still using this version, and I think also
> affected.
Add this line to global and
On Friday 06 April 2001 00:09, Cherubini Enrico wrote:
> Ciao,
>
> Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 09:38:46PM +0100, Steve Ball wrote:
> > It is most secure to block everything and only open the ports that are
> > absolutely necessary.
>
> ok, this is clear. What's the way you ppl do that throught
> ipchains
On Friday 06 April 2001 00:09, Cherubini Enrico wrote:
> Ciao,
>
> Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 09:38:46PM +0100, Steve Ball wrote:
> > It is most secure to block everything and only open the ports that are
> > absolutely necessary.
>
> ok, this is clear. What's the way you ppl do that throught
> ipchain
On Thursday 01 March 2001 14:08, Maarten Vink wrote:
> Yes it does, security.debian.org is located somewhere outside the US and
> also carries non-US updates.
security.debian.org is located in The Netherlands at the Rijks Universiteit
Leiden to be correctly.
Hans
On Thursday 01 March 2001 14:08, Maarten Vink wrote:
> Yes it does, security.debian.org is located somewhere outside the US and
> also carries non-US updates.
security.debian.org is located in The Netherlands at the Rijks Universiteit
Leiden to be correctly.
Hans
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
19 matches
Mail list logo
