Re: PaX on Debian

2004-07-26 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:38:37 -0400, John Richard Moser wrote: > |>: Tags added: fixed-upstream Request was from GOTO Masanori > |>: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Full text available. > |> > |>Fixed in upstream. Either use an updated glibc in the n

Re: Bug#182886: libc6: local hostnames containing a dot get forwarded outside when doing host-lookups.

2003-03-07 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 2 Mar 2003 19:18:02 +0100, Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Vassilii Khachaturov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030228 21:58]: > > > Thanks, I missed that. Being placed unter "internal variables" and > > > "debug" seems to have tricked me in ignoring this part. > > > > > > There shoul

Re: Bug#182886: libc6: local hostnames containing a dot get forwarded outside when doing host-lookups.

2003-03-07 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 2 Mar 2003 19:18:02 +0100, Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Vassilii Khachaturov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030228 21:58]: > > > Thanks, I missed that. Being placed unter "internal variables" and > > > "debug" seems to have tricked me in ignoring this part. > > > > > > There shoul

Re: HTTP tunnel with linux server and windows client

2003-03-04 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:30:05 +0300, Ant wrote: > Is there is any software to bypass http proxy > > --- --{Inet} - > > and win client after such proceess could work with any TCP/IP Services. > > Some kind of pptp via http $-). http://sourceforge.jp/projects/stone/ stone Description:

Re: HTTP tunnel with linux server and windows client

2003-03-04 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:30:05 +0300, Ant wrote: > Is there is any software to bypass http proxy > > --- --{Inet} - > > and win client after such proceess could work with any TCP/IP Services. > > Some kind of pptp via http $-). http://sourceforge.jp/projects/stone/ stone Description:

Re: SubRPC vulnerability: is Debian libc6 affected?

2002-08-12 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:59:46 +0300, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote: > Recently several glibc vulnerabilities have been published, and there is > only some disjoint information about their status for Debian here and > there. Maybe this bunch of issues is worth one combined DSA that will > explain what is f