After reading the whole thread, I think I finally understand what is going on.
/etc/services really is only for mapping names to port numbers, but at least
one daemon on your system uses service names instead of numbers. The daemon
is inetd and it is that daemon that handles services such as cha
The only thing you can accomplish by commenting stuff in /etc/services is
that netstat and other programs will show the ports by number instead of by
name ( you commented the translation entry ) :) The ports are still open.
On Wednesday 05 December 2001 07:59 am, J. Paul Bruns-Bielkowicz wrote:
After reading the whole thread, I think I finally understand what is going on.
/etc/services really is only for mapping names to port numbers, but at least
one daemon on your system uses service names instead of numbers. The daemon
is inetd and it is that daemon that handles services such as ch
The only thing you can accomplish by commenting stuff in /etc/services is
that netstat and other programs will show the ports by number instead of by
name ( you commented the translation entry ) :) The ports are still open.
On Wednesday 05 December 2001 07:59 am, J. Paul Bruns-Bielkowicz wrote:
/etc/services doesn't control services. The only function of this file is to
translate between port numbers and service names. Commenting stuff in there
doesn't help. What you need is to figure out what processes are keeping the
ports open and shut down all the unneeded ones. In this case you ap
/etc/services doesn't control services. The only function of this file is to
translate between port numbers and service names. Commenting stuff in there
doesn't help. What you need is to figure out what processes are keeping the
ports open and shut down all the unneeded ones. In this case you a
The proper english spelling is Herostratus
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 01:59 pm, Dmitriy Kropivnitskiy wrote:
> The name was Gerastrat :)
installed
on both my home system and my work system. In any case, I get 20-100 port
scans about once in ~2-3 days. There are a lot of idiots out there you know.
To protect from single port scans use LaBrea.
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 03:21 pm, Tim Haynes wrote:
> Dmitriy Kropivnitskiy <
The proper english spelling is Herostratus
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 01:59 pm, Dmitriy Kropivnitskiy wrote:
> The name was Gerastrat :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
installed
on both my home system and my work system. In any case, I get 20-100 port
scans about once in ~2-3 days. There are a lot of idiots out there you know.
To protect from single port scans use LaBrea.
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 03:21 pm, Tim Haynes wrote:
> Dmitriy Kropivnitskiy <
FTP is a funny protocol. Do you use masquarading? Did you use state modules
or just opened port 21? You need to have -s RELATED in order to have nice FTP.
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 02:33 pm, phadell wrote:
> I am having some problems in relation to speed of traffic of packages when
> using ip
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 08:08 am, thomas lakofski wrote:
> On 14 Nov 2001, Tim Haynes wrote:
> > If you want to stop port-scans, use a proper firewall with DENY
> > (ipchains) or DROP (iptables) by default.
>
> how does this stop the scanner from identifying open ports?
>
If you actually dro
--Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christian Haugan
> > Toldnes Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:02 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: Mentioning La
FTP is a funny protocol. Do you use masquarading? Did you use state modules
or just opened port 21? You need to have -s RELATED in order to have nice FTP.
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 02:33 pm, phadell wrote:
> I am having some problems in relation to speed of traffic of packages when
> using i
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 08:08 am, thomas lakofski wrote:
> On 14 Nov 2001, Tim Haynes wrote:
> > If you want to stop port-scans, use a proper firewall with DENY
> > (ipchains) or DROP (iptables) by default.
>
> how does this stop the scanner from identifying open ports?
>
If you actually dr
--Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christian Haugan
> > Toldnes Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:02 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Mentioning Layne one mo
I have just found a residiual page in the google cache. It shows that Layne (
remember the rude guy from september was subscribed to a whole bunch of mls
most of them debian related )
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:SPW2_7zBmf8:justinfinity.2y.net:8080/misc/subscribe-fucker.html+a515luna&hl=
I have just found a residiual page in the google cache. It shows that Layne (
remember the rude guy from september was subscribed to a whole bunch of mls
most of them debian related )
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:SPW2_7zBmf8:justinfinity.2y.net:8080/misc/subscribe-fucker.html+a515luna&hl
18 matches
Mail list logo
