Thats absolutely ridiculous.
I would file one at once, that should definitely not go unchecked, at least. I
can appreciate the motivation, but for my own sanity I'm too paranoid to a)
accept strange unknown files/connections or b) send out requests for such data.
Especially considering since
Thats absolutely ridiculous.
I would file one at once, that should definitely not go unchecked, at least. I can
appreciate the motivation, but for my own sanity I'm too paranoid to a) accept strange
unknown files/connections or b) send out requests for such data. Especially
considering since
No, and it seems they've fixed their problem on their end.
I think it hurt them a lot worse (on bandwidth) than it hurt you :)
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 19:21:45 +0100 (CET)
Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/magazine/technical/linux.html
pgp9lyvIGf
No, and it seems they've fixed their problem on their end.
I think it hurt them a lot worse (on bandwidth) than it hurt you :)
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 19:21:45 +0100 (CET)
Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/magazine/technical/linux.html
msg08406/
I don't know if it's the catch on your problem, but it'll be interesting
reading noless;
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2002-q3/0037.html
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 12:19, Simon Langhof wrote:
> Hi
> I noticed some (40 until now) strange entries in my Apache access.log. They
> start
I don't know if it's the catch on your problem, but it'll be interesting
reading noless;
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2002-q3/0037.html
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 12:19, Simon Langhof wrote:
> Hi
> I noticed some (40 until now) strange entries in my Apache access.log. They started
Specifically, port 16001 is ESD (ESound) IIRC..
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 10:55, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>
> > So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111 from
> > within my own system? Should I be concerned? Should I expect the worst?
>
>
Specifically, port 16001 is ESD (ESound) IIRC..
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 10:55, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>
> > So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111 from
> > within my own system? Should I be concerned? Should I expect the worst?
>
>
I had the same problem. This kind of initiative by the package
shouldn't be so passive. It should be corrected, or one might find
themselves frustrated.
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 23:51, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
I had the same problem. This kind of initiative by the package
shouldn't be so passive. It should be corrected, or one might find
themselves frustrated.
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 23:51, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10 matches
Mail list logo
