Hi Gioele--
On Thu 2023-12-21 11:02:06 +0100, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> On 21/12/23 04:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> As the Uploader of rust-sequoia-openpgp, what do you think of the
> related sequoia-chameleon-gnupg project [1] (drop-in replacement for gpg
> that uses sequoi
hey folks--
[ This message won't make sense unless the reader distinguishes clearly
between OpenPGP the protocol and GnuPG the implementation! As a
community we have a history of fuzzily conflating the two terms, which
is one of the reasons that we're in this mess today. Please read
expli
On 09/21/2014 02:04 PM, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> a well programmed dpkg-cmp.
> ... and as long as the tool should not be available simply un-ar and
> compare
> the data.tar.gz-s.
fwiw, this suggestion fails to compare the contents of control.tar.gz,
which includes the maintainer scripts (preins
On 09/22/2014 04:07 AM, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> Am 22.09.14 um 01:52 schrieb Paul Wise:
>> The Debian archive does not allow files to change their checksum, so
>> every signature addition requires a new version number. That sounds
>> like a bad idea to me.
> Yes, that is something we definitel
On 09/19/2014 06:07 AM, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
>Isn`t there really any way to include the signatures in the header of
> the .deb files?
> Why not simply add multiple signature files in the control.tar.gz of a
> .deb just next
> to the md5sums which should in deed be a sha256sums (otherwise t
On 09/19/2014 12:34 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> Finally did this:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762153
>
> Please note that you proposal to add signatures to .deb files will
> break reproducible builds because th
sorry, this proposed boilerplate change was meant to go to the list, not
just to dann.
Thanks for all your work, folks.
--dkg
--- Begin Message ---
On 03/10/2010 04:53 PM, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 04:09:48PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> So would t
On 03/10/2010 02:49 PM, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:18:38PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> It's not clear to me from the instructions above whether users should
>> re-build their kvm modules package as well as installing the revised
>&
Hi Debian Security folks--
On 03/10/2010 01:18 PM, dann frazier wrote:
>
> Debian Security Advisory DSA-2010 secur...@debian.org
> http://www.debian.org/security/ Dann Frazier
> March
9 matches
Mail list logo
