.
The bind version before the upgrade was 9.2.3-3 and after the upgrade
9.2.4-rc2-1.
Has anyone any similar experience? Should I post a bug?
Regards,
~kmag
--
Costas Magkos
Internet Systematics Lab
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
bind version before the upgrade was 9.2.3-3 and after the upgrade
9.2.4-rc2-1.
Has anyone any similar experience? Should I post a bug?
Regards,
~kmag
--
Costas Magkos
Internet Systematics Lab
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed
On 18/04/04 17:41, Philipp Schulte wrote:
LeVA wrote:
I'm trying to exclude my mailsystem's logs from the /var/log/syslog
file. I've changed this line in /etc/syslog.conf:
*.*;auth,authpriv.none -/var/log/syslog
to:
*.*;auth,authpriv.none;mail.!* -/var/log/syslog
Try "*.*;auth,a
On 18/04/04 17:41, Philipp Schulte wrote:
LeVA wrote:
I'm trying to exclude my mailsystem's logs from the /var/log/syslog
file. I've changed this line in /etc/syslog.conf:
*.*;auth,authpriv.none -/var/log/syslog
to:
*.*;auth,authpriv.none;mail.!* -/var/log/syslog
Try "*.*;auth,authp
On 30/03/04 18:50, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Costas Magkos:
I am running woody on a SPARCstation 10 with kernel from testing:
# uname -a
Linux foo 2.4.24-sparc32 #1 Fri Jan 30 16:04:55 EST 2004 sparc unknown
When I run ps I get the following two lines before the actual output.
# ps
On 30/03/04 18:50, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Costas Magkos:
I am running woody on a SPARCstation 10 with kernel from testing:
# uname -a
Linux foo 2.4.24-sparc32 #1 Fri Jan 30 16:04:55 EST 2004 sparc unknown
When I run ps I get the following two lines before the actual output.
# ps ax
[kupdated]
7 ?SW 0:02 [kjournald]
81 ?SW 0:00 [kjournald]
82 ?SW 0:23 [kjournald]
83 ?SW 0:01 [kjournald]
Does anyone know how severe is this warning? How can I eliminate it?
Thanks in advance.
~kmag
Costas Magkos
Internet Systematics Lab
[kupdated]
7 ?SW 0:02 [kjournald]
81 ?SW 0:00 [kjournald]
82 ?SW 0:23 [kjournald]
83 ?SW 0:01 [kjournald]
Does anyone know how severe is this warning? How can I eliminate it?
Thanks in advance.
~kmag
Costas Magkos
Internet Systematics Lab
NCSR
owing your advice ;-) .
Anyway, this was not for nothing. Thanks to Maurizio, I discovered the
/etc/apt/preferences file.
~kmag
On 29/03/04 18:33, Clive Menzies wrote:
On (29/03/04 16:54), Costas Magkos wrote:
Hi debian people,
Is there a way to downgrade to stable, after having apt-get
installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
~kmag
On 29/03/04 17:32, Tibor Repasi wrote:
replace /etc/apt/sources.list with the old one, do an dist-upgrade
again and have fun
I made this ones ... it was painfull, but successful at the end.
Regads,
RT
Costas Magkos wrote:
Hi debian people,
Is
your advice ;-) .
Anyway, this was not for nothing. Thanks to Maurizio, I discovered the
/etc/apt/preferences file.
~kmag
On 29/03/04 18:33, Clive Menzies wrote:
On (29/03/04 16:54), Costas Magkos wrote:
Hi debian people,
Is there a way to downgrade to stable, after having apt-get dist-up
Hi debian people,
Is there a way to downgrade to stable, after having apt-get dist-upgrade
to testing?
~kmag
P.S. people of debian-user please CC me.
Costas Magkos
Internet Systematics Lab
NCSR "Demokritos"
Athens. Greece
Hi debian people,
Is there a way to downgrade to stable, after having apt-get dist-upgrade
to testing?
~kmag
P.S. people of debian-user please CC me.
Costas Magkos
Internet Systematics Lab
NCSR "Demokritos"
Athens. Greece
installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
~kmag
On 29/03/04 17:32, Tibor Repasi wrote:
replace /etc/apt/sources.list with the old one, do an dist-upgrade
again and have fun
I made this ones ... it was painfull, but successful at the end.
Regads,
RT
Costas Magkos wrote:
Hi debian people,
Is there a
Hi debian people,
Is there a way to downgrade to stable, after having apt-get dist-upgrade
to testing?
~kmag
P.S. people of debian-user please CC me.
Costas Magkos
Internet Systematics Lab
NCSR "Demokritos"
Athens. Greece
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi debian people,
Is there a way to downgrade to stable, after having apt-get dist-upgrade
to testing?
~kmag
P.S. people of debian-user please CC me.
Costas Magkos
Internet Systematics Lab
NCSR "Demokritos"
Athens. Greece
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
I forgot to mention that /var/lib/bind9 is the chroot'ed directory
On 26/03/04 19:53, Costas Magkos wrote:
Hi all,
I have set up bind9 in a chroot'ed enviroment. I've just found out
that I should have added SYSLOGD="-a /var/lib/bind9/dev/log" in
/etc/init.d/sysklog
ddition in
sysklogd startup script, I' m beggining to have doubts about the
fuctionality of the chroot.
Is there a way to test whether a chroot works? Does anyone know if the
above syslog option is really needed? According to the man page of
syslog it is needed.
Thanks in advance
~kmag
I forgot to mention that /var/lib/bind9 is the chroot'ed directory
On 26/03/04 19:53, Costas Magkos wrote:
Hi all,
I have set up bind9 in a chroot'ed enviroment. I've just found out
that I should have added SYSLOGD="-a /var/lib/bind9/dev/log" in
/etc/init.d/sysklog
ddition in
sysklogd startup script, I' m beggining to have doubts about the
fuctionality of the chroot.
Is there a way to test whether a chroot works? Does anyone know if the
above syslog option is really needed? According to the man page of
syslog it is needed.
Thanks in advance
~kma
1]
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch-sec-services.en.html#s-firewall-setup
(section 5.14.3.1 Doing it the Debian way)
On 04/03/04 17:14, Costas Magkos wrote:
Hi all,
Can someone give me some best-practices for setting up iptables on a
Debian system? I'm lookin
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch-sec-services.en.html#s-firewall-setup
(section 5.14.3.1 Doing it the Debian way)
On 04/03/04 17:14, Costas Magkos wrote:
Hi all,
Can someone give me some best-practices for setting up iptables on a
Debian system? I'm looking fo
i-spoof filtering is activated by default). It involves
too much editing, which I have no problem doing it if someone tells me
it's worth it.
Thanks in advance,
~kmag
Costas Magkos
Internet Systematics Lab
Athens, Greece
i-spoof filtering is activated by default). It involves
too much editing, which I have no problem doing it if someone tells me
it's worth it.
Thanks in advance,
~kmag
Costas Magkos
Internet Systematics Lab
Athens, Greece
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
24 matches
Mail list logo