Re: spam block

On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 08:58, Celso González wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 02:47:52PM +0200, Konstantin wrote: > > hi, > > > > I need a spam filter, but I need one which works with sendmail and is not > > spamassasin(the system needs an old perl 5.0.X), but spamassasin needs perl > > >5.6 > > >

RE: Peace is not off topic

First of all, I deeply apologize for posting the following rant on this list. But I *must* say it. Does anyone know where this kind of discussion could be followed on? On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 21:42, Steve Hagerman wrote: > > Thank God for a smart leader that is willing to fight to protect out > wa

RE: Peace is not off topic

First of all, I deeply apologize for posting the following rant on this list. But I *must* say it. Does anyone know where this kind of discussion could be followed on? On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 21:42, Steve Hagerman wrote: > > Thank God for a smart leader that is willing to fight to protect out > wa

Re: other mysterious port things

Sorry I "have" :)) Cesar wrote: > > Hi ! > > I have a disquette with this utilities clean. > #mount /dev/fd0 /floppy > #cd /floppy > #./netstat -antp > > Regards > César. >

Re: other mysterious port things

Hi ! I'm a disquette with this utilities clean. #mount /dev/fd0 /floppy #cd /floppy #./netstat -antp Regards César. Ken Seefried wrote: > > Tim Haynes writes: > > > > Why do people persist in using nmap at test phase? Sure, if you've > > been cracked, scan yourself if you want, bu

Re: other mysterious port things

Sorry I "have" :)) Cesar wrote: > > Hi ! > > I have a disquette with this utilities clean. > #mount /dev/fd0 /floppy > #cd /floppy > #./netstat -antp > > Regards > César. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Re: other mysterious port things

Hi ! I'm a disquette with this utilities clean. #mount /dev/fd0 /floppy #cd /floppy #./netstat -antp Regards César. Ken Seefried wrote: > > Tim Haynes writes: > > > > Why do people persist in using nmap at test phase? Sure, if you've > > been cracked, scan yourself if you want, b

Re: Clear screan question

In reply to wes schreiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Not that I can see, though I'd love to know of a clean way to clear the >scroll-back buffer. I agree it's a bit hackish. Can anyone come up >with something better? > reset -Q -- Cesar Augusto Rorato Crusius

Re: Clear screan question

In reply to wes schreiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Not that I can see, though I'd love to know of a clean way to clear the >scroll-back buffer. I agree it's a bit hackish. Can anyone come up >with something better? > reset -Q -- Cesar Augusto Rorato Crusius