I have not seen any discussion of what appears to be a very serious
problem in Apt's security architecture.
According to the information here https://wiki.debian.org/SecureApt
this attack should not work at all. Apt downloads the Release.gpg and
Release files then verifies a valid signature usin
good if it does get resolved.
--
Brian May
asy way of being able to link each issue to each
patch. So if a CVE was provided for each issue, it would be relatively
hard to link it to the appropriate patch with 100% certainty.
With so many different issues, I suspect it is going to be overwhelming
requesting a CVE for each issue no matter what you do.
--
Brian May
unsubscribe
From: Luciano Bello
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 5:16 AM
To: debian-security-annou...@lists.debian.org
Subject: [SECURITY] [DSA 3425-1] tryton-server security update
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- -
unsubscribe
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Luciano Bello wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> - -
> Debian Security Advisory DSA-3425-1 secur...@debian.org
> https://www.debian.o
accept my apologies if I'm
stating the obvious.
Many thanks to you and your colleagues for maintaining such a great
operating system.
Cheerio for now,
Brian.
On 20 March 2012 07:05, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -BEGIN PG
x27;re
looking for. There's a story about a stranger from the land of w00t.
It's in Rootless Root, if I recall.
--
_ Brian Ryans 8B2A 54C4 E275 8CFD 8A7D 5D0B 0AD0 B014 C112 13D0 .
( ) ICQ 43190205 | Mail/Jabber/Yahoo/MSN: brianlry...@gmail.com ..:
X ASCII Ribbon Campaign
y.
Many Thanks & all the best.
Brian Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/41396-22011365175831...@1m12months.com
y.
Many Thanks & all the best.
Brian Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4164-220112128143027...@1m12m.com
y.
Many Thanks & all the best.
Brian Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4171-2201121283735...@your1m.com
est as soon as possible, so you don't miss out.
Totally upset by my intrusion? Sorry, please send me an email
with 'I'm not up to it' in the subject line and you'll never, ever
hear from me or the business again.
Best regards
Brian Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
running ident.
best,
.brian
--
Brian Bilbrey : bilb...@orbdesigns.com
"Regulatory science is to science as bear traps are to bears."
Dr. Jerry Pournelle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
in other words.
I don't know about the gnome-keyring PAM module, or if that is a
problem to have missing.
Brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
security you should be able to finger the
exact request.
Finally, a bit of a plug. I wrote a script to look for processes hanging
off apache that have been there for too long e.g. a bot. Code at:
http://www.netsoc.tcd.ie/~bbrazil/code/brmon/ (long_running_apache).
Brian
--
Website: http://www.netsoc.tcd.ie/~bbrazil
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rison of "1.0.1" and
"1sarge1" compares the 1s numerically (equal) and then compares the '.'
to the 's', which results in the '.' having a lower version.
I don't know enough about security version numbering practice to suggest
a fix.
Br
k
connections, especially to port 6667 (IRC). Also look for www-data owned
files in /tmp.
Brian
--
Website: http://www.netsoc.tcd.ie/~bbrazil
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
y configured for multiple users, quite handy. The man
pages and README are required if you want it setup right, though.
best,
.brian
--
Brian Bilbrey : http://www.orbdesigns.com/
"Kirk to Enterprise -- beam down yeoman Rand and a six-pack."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
You may have received this comment already -- but please include the
package name as one of the first words in the subject line as tradition,
instead of the last -- or else I won't see it in my MUA.
i.e "New phpgroupware package fixes..." instead of above.
Thanks!
Brian
Mich
t 4 lines:
*.* /var/log/apache/access.log
*.* /var/log/apache/error.log
*.* /var/log/boa/access_log
*.* /var/log/boa/error_log
These put ALL system and kernel log messages into the apache logs.
I suggest removing these lines and restarting sysklogd.
Brian
--
Website: http://netsoc.tcd.
Okay, I'm all set now. Thank you all for the help and don't let this
msg stop the discussion if you all wish to continue it.
--
"As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of
corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the
country will endeavor to prolon
ck to the problem at hand, is it required to be a superuser
in order to listen to all traffic coming in on a NIC? (I've always
believed yes, but I'm just making sure here) And is it possible to
drop a NIC into promisc mode (as root) and leave it there?
Also, thanks sooo much for the
m
the obvious "anyone can see anything" sort of concern?
Thanks!
Brian
--
"As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of
corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the
country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the
prejudices of
ill siletnly lose mails (if
> you drop them).
Well, yes, choosing one of the broken options is broken. Just giving
a message 5 spamassassin points for tripping a blacklist seems pretty
reasonable, though.
-Brian
--
Brian Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ill siletnly lose mails (if
> you drop them).
Well, yes, choosing one of the broken options is broken. Just giving
a message 5 spamassassin points for tripping a blacklist seems pretty
reasonable, though.
-Brian
--
Brian Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
T
r /LFS
chroot /LFS #Pretend there's a shell etc.
chown -R 0.0 * .* #There were some dotfiles
This resulted in my entire directory structure being owned by root -
which broke quite a bit of stuff. Came across a reference a few months
ago indicating this was the 'correct' behaviour for Linux.
Brian
r /LFS
chroot /LFS #Pretend there's a shell etc.
chown -R 0.0 * .* #There were some dotfiles
This resulted in my entire directory structure being owned by root -
which broke quite a bit of stuff. Came across a reference a few months
ago indicating this was the 'correct' beha
that out after doing chown -R 0.0
.. in a chroot while I was compiling LFS. (Was running SuSE 7.0 at the
time - 2.4.19).
Brian
that out after doing chown -R 0.0
.. in a chroot while I was compiling LFS. (Was running SuSE 7.0 at the
time - 2.4.19).
Brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e method.
Another (better) method is lsof(as root). Similarly you could
parse /proc for memory mappings to the revalent libraries.
Brian
e method.
Another (better) method is lsof(as root). Similarly you could
parse /proc for memory mappings to the revalent libraries.
Brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey,
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 13:33, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Friday 19 September 2003 17:59, Brian Rectanus wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> > I cannot get STARTTLS to work with the newest snendmail in unstable. It
> > *always* complains that the key file is group re
Hey,
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 13:33, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Friday 19 September 2003 17:59, Brian Rectanus wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> > I cannot get STARTTLS to work with the newest snendmail in unstable. It
> > *always* complains that the key file is group re
d stable I do not get these
messages.
sm-mta[31901]: starting daemon (8.12.9): SMTP
sm-mta[3719]: starting daemon (8.12.3): SMTP
Anyone else see this?
later,
-Brian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
d stable I do not get these
messages.
sm-mta[31901]: starting daemon (8.12.9): SMTP
sm-mta[3719]: starting daemon (8.12.3): SMTP
Anyone else see this?
later,
-Brian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 01:53:48AM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2003, Brian McGroarty wrote:
>
> > I'd like to disable netstat and similar programs for my shell
> > users.
>
> Could this be an alternative solution?
>
> # dpkg-statov
I'd like to disable netstat and similar programs for my shell
users. One of my users runs a MUCK (like a MUD) and would like to
protect the MUCK users' network locations from other shell users.
I'm running with a 2.4 kernel with /proc, and so netstat is an
unprivileged utility that merely grabs in
{${lookup {$1} lsearch {/etc/shadow} {$value} fail}} \
}} \
{yes}{no} }"
server_set_id = $1
Some might curse, but I've set exim to run with group "shadow". Gasp.
Regards,
Brian
--
Init Systems - Linux consulting
031 767-0139082 769-2320[EMAIL PROTECTED]
{${lookup {$1} lsearch {/etc/shadow} {$value} fail}} \
}} \
{yes}{no} }"
server_set_id = $1
Some might curse, but I've set exim to run with group "shadow". Gasp.
Regards,
Brian
--
Init Systems - Linux consulting
031 767-0139082 769-2320[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a problem, but upgrading to 3.4 isn't really possible for
several reasons.
- Brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and potato? When you are logged in via ssh and type
'last' do you not see the ssh connection?
Brian Flaherty
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
arlier meeting, you
said that proper settings, permissions, and restrictions could prevent that.
Since this is one of the situations for which I am most concerned, can you
give me (in excruciating detail) the steps which would prevent this?
arlier meeting, you
said that proper settings, permissions, and restrictions could prevent that.
Since this is one of the situations for which I am most concerned, can you
give me (in excruciating detail) the steps which would prevent this?
==
nd you get no additional security from
using Kerberos over sending passwords over an encrypted channel (whether
SSL or SSH based).
I have updated my FAQ at <http://snoopy.apana.org.au/~bam/debian/faq/>
to include this question, as it seems to be a very common question.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nd you get no additional security from
using Kerberos over sending passwords over an encrypted channel (whether
SSL or SSH based).
I have updated my FAQ at <http://snoopy.apana.org.au/~bam/debian/faq/>
to include this question, as it seems to be a very common question.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL
what security goals
am I circumventing by changing this?
Thanks for any suggestions or pointers.
Brian Flaherty
Also, what security goals
am I circumventing by changing this?
Thanks for any suggestions or pointers.
Brian Flaherty
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ears to reveal a router problem someplace in
XO's network, in the UK:
fe0-llb-x-many.RL2-HE.access.rtr.uk.xo.net (195.224.254.198)
I'd counsel patience. I'd also wonder why you posted this to
debian-security? But neither here nor there.
.brian
--
Brian Bilbrey "Th
ears to reveal a router problem someplace in
XO's network, in the UK:
fe0-llb-x-many.RL2-HE.access.rtr.uk.xo.net (195.224.254.198)
I'd counsel patience. I'd also wonder why you posted this to
debian-security? But neither here nor there.
.brian
--
Brian Bilbrey "Th
address. Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I think this
effectively keeps the service from listening on other interfaces.
Brian
ll smtp traffic, except
from the smarthost. And finally, I have telenetd running from
xinetd.conf, but it is bound to my internal NIC, so there isn't an
open telnet port on the internet. Maybe a configuration like this
would work for you?
Brian
27;s IP
address. Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I think this
effectively keeps the service from listening on other interfaces.
Brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cks all smtp traffic, except
from the smarthost. And finally, I have telenetd running from
xinetd.conf, but it is bound to my internal NIC, so there isn't an
open telnet port on the internet. Maybe a configuration like this
would work for you?
Brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
/iptables-tutorial/iptables-tutorial.html#AEN1224
MIght be useful for you.
.brian
--
Brian Bilbrey "The ships hung in the sky in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] much the same way that bricks don't."
www.orbdesigns.comDoug Adams, H2G
/iptables-tutorial/iptables-tutorial.html#AEN1224
MIght be useful for you.
.brian
--
Brian Bilbrey "The ships hung in the sky in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] much the same way that bricks don't."
www.orbdesigns.comDoug Adams, H2G
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
any sections that looked
like a code reference.
Thanks for any thoughts or suggestions.
Brian Flaherty
any sections that looked
like a code reference.
Thanks for any thoughts or suggestions.
Brian Flaherty
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computerised prank call service. Wind up your friends! Click on the this
link. http://jokelinegold.8m.com (Works on any phone in the UK)
Computerised prank call service. Wind up your friends! Click on the this
link. http://jokelinegold.8m.com (Works on any phone in the UK)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Is anyone here familiar with something called the St. Jude model of
root exploit detection (see http://sourceforge.net/projects/stjude)?
There is a paper explaining the idea on the website, as well as a
linux kernel module. It sounds like a good idea, but has anyone here
used it?
Brian
Hello,
Is anyone here familiar with something called the St. Jude model of
root exploit detection (see http://sourceforge.net/projects/stjude)?
There is a paper explaining the idea on the website, as well as a
linux kernel module. It sounds like a good idea, but has anyone here
used it?
Brian
f the things I read said to shut off lpd. I
know there have been all kinds of problems with lpd, but how do I
print then? I guess the message is that balancing security and
usability is the issue.
--
Brian P. Flaherty
--
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
XAGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
t;;
static int fishlen = 0;
static char *fishp;
Could a message go in the README.Debian file in netdiag that says
something to the effect of "netwatch will create a silly file,
/root/.fishingboat, don't worry about it." How about on the manpage
in the files sectio
also spent a long time one day tracking down some
files that appeared in /tmp that had names I won't type here. I
tracked them down to being files created by a RH sound RPM.
So, if anyone is familiar with this, I would appreciate learning about
what this is. Thanks.
Bria
f the things I read said to shut off lpd. I
know there have been all kinds of problems with lpd, but how do I
print then? I guess the message is that balancing security and
usability is the issue.
--
Brian P. Flaherty
--
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
XAGAINST
t;;
static int fishlen = 0;
static char *fishp;
Could a message go in the README.Debian file in netdiag that says
something to the effect of "netwatch will create a silly file,
/root/.fishingboat, don't worry about it." How about on the manpage
in the files sectio
also spent a long time one day tracking down some
files that appeared in /tmp that had names I won't type here. I
tracked them down to being files created by a RH sound RPM.
So, if anyone is familiar with this, I would appreciate learning about
what this is. Thanks.
Bria
www.kernel.org
that has kernel specific cryptography information. And last, I recall
that the PGP documentation had a very good introduction to
cryptography.
HTH,
Brian
l.org
that has kernel specific cryptography information. And last, I recall
that the PGP documentation had a very good introduction to
cryptography.
HTH,
Brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e. In fact, in the example xinetd.conf
on the man page, rstatd is disabled in the defaults section, but there
is no 'disable=yes' in the rstatd description. Thanks for your time.
Brian Flaherty
e. In fact, in the example xinetd.conf
on the man page, rstatd is disabled in the defaults section, but there
is no 'disable=yes' in the rstatd description. Thanks for your time.
Brian Flaherty
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> nobody by
> +(uid=0)
I also saw this recently when SAS (a statistics package) opened up a
TCP port to listen for data shares. Since noticing it, I have seen it
several more times for other tasks, like the cron jobs mentioned
earlier.
--
Brian P. Flaherty
/"\
user
> nobody by
> +(uid=0)
I also saw this recently when SAS (a statistics package) opened up a
TCP port to listen for data shares. Since noticing it, I have seen it
several more times for other tasks, like the cron jobs mentioned
earlier.
--
Brian P. Flaherty
/"\
[line=169]
I am following this up because I have also posted a question about
'disabled =' in the defaults section of xinetd.conf. Are these
version differences? I am using xinetd Version 2.1.8.8p3 from
stable/potato. Thanks for any thoughts or suggestions.
Brian Flaherty
--
rning my use of Debian, I am trying to do this, while maintaining
compatability with the package system.
Thanks for any suggestions.
Brian Flaherty
--
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
XAGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
[line=169]
I am following this up because I have also posted a question about
'disabled =' in the defaults section of xinetd.conf. Are these
version differences? I am using xinetd Version 2.1.8.8p3 from
stable/potato. Thanks for any thoughts or suggestions.
Brian Flaherty
--
rning my use of Debian, I am trying to do this, while maintaining
compatability with the package system.
Thanks for any suggestions.
Brian Flaherty
--
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
XAGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
u8190%u00c3%u0003%u8b00%u531b%u53ff%u0
078%u%u00=a HTTP/1.0" 400 328
--Brian
u8190%u00c3%u0003%u8b00%u531b%u53ff%u0
078%u%u00=a HTTP/1.0" 400 328
--Brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
orked for the most part.
Excellent.
> iput: device 03:01 inode 110047 still has aliases!
I haven't a clue. You should take these questions to debian-user.
They'll be exposed to a larger audience and they'll be on-topic. :-)
brian
orked for the most part.
Excellent.
> iput: device 03:01 inode 110047 still has aliases!
I haven't a clue. You should take these questions to debian-user.
They'll be exposed to a larger audience and they'll be on-topic. :-)
brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim Uckun wrote:
> I do not seem to have dpkg-awk on my system do you know where I could get it?
Did you try "apt-get install dpkg-awk"? :-)
Tim Uckun wrote:
> > Something went horribly wrong I think I might have hit the wrong key on
> > deselect but whenever I quit dselect it wants to remove about 270 packages
> > and hold three of them. Is there a way to rebuild the package database?
You need to get your selections back to a sane
Tim Uckun wrote:
> I do not seem to have dpkg-awk on my system do you know where I could get it?
Did you try "apt-get install dpkg-awk"? :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim Uckun wrote:
> > Something went horribly wrong I think I might have hit the wrong key on
> > deselect but whenever I quit dselect it wants to remove about 270 packages
> > and hold three of them. Is there a way to rebuild the package database?
You need to get your selections back to a sane
$ dict projection
[...]
>From WordNet (r) 1.6 [wn]:
projection
[...]
6: a defense mechanism by which your own traits and emotions
are attributed to someone else
hehe...
Orlando Padilla wrote:
> Did valentine's day piss you off and now you're making no sense to ge
$ dict projection
[...]
>From WordNet (r) 1.6 [wn]:
projection
[...]
6: a defense mechanism by which your own traits and emotions
are attributed to someone else
hehe...
Orlando Padilla wrote:
> Did valentine's day piss you off and now you're making no sense to g
t. and netstat told you it was
gnome-session. so gnome-session is the program you should be researching. nterm
has absolutely NOTHING to do with what your reporting.
I hope this clearifies matters for you.
--
Brian Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Beta (n):
Software undergoes beta testing s
t. and netstat told you it was gnome-session. so
gnome-session is the program you should be researching. nterm has absolutely NOTHING
to do with what your reporting.
I hope this clearifies matters for you.
--
Brian Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Beta (n):
Software undergoes beta testing s
0.2.6, the version
in slink.
Please post to the necessary lists.
--
Brian M. Almeida
Linux Systems Engineer | http://www.winstar.com | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Developer | http://www.debian.org | [EMAIL PROT
ot in 0.2.6, the version
in slink.
Please post to the necessary lists.
--
Brian M. Almeida
Linux Systems Engineer | http://www.winstar.com | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Developer | http://www.debian.org | [EMAIL PROT
--_=XFMail.1.4.4.Linux:2430005809:27687=_--
oh wait, yes they are the same. Why XFMail is doing this, I don't know
(as I don't use it myself). Perhaps this is a bug in XFMail.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
suggestions for how to make pine and mh use sendmail rather
then port 25. This was years ago now, the situation might be different
now. I have purged pine, so can't check.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jacob> solution like hotmail would be a good start.
Another option: perhaps some sort of mail <--> WWW gateway might
work. With SSL encryption... Not sure what free mail <--> WWW gateways
exist, I am sure somebody can fill in the details for me.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
isting...
Out of curiosity: Is there anyway to avoid this?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> That sounds like it should be filed in a bug report, wouldn't you agree?
Good thinking. It looks like a similar bug has been open for a while;
I'll go tell Chris to to fix it.
--
Brian Kimball
One more thing: you can also add these lines to /etc/orbitrc to make
them system-wide defaults. This file doesn't seem to be included in
Debian, I guess it's another undocumented feature.
Brian Kimball wrote:
> $ cat ~/.orbitrc
> ORBIIOPUSock=1
> ORBIIOPIPv4=0
> ORBIIO
esd shouldn't even be running. Grrr.
--
Brian Kimball
>>>>> "Alexander" == Alexander Hvostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexander> Brian, Ah, yes. I knew I saw something about Kerberos V
Alexander> in the package lists.
Alexander> How good is Heimdal, security/progress wise?
progress wise:
It
rom happening?
Alexander> Given the newly relaxed crypto export laws, it may be
Alexander> quite possible to export it now, if that's what's
Alexander> preventing it from being Debianized.
Heimdal is a free implementation of Kerberos 5 that is in potato and
woody
ich is of limited
> usefulness, AFAIK.)
Right. I realized you were talking about unused ports instead of ports
that you want to be protected after I sent my mail. :(
--
Brian Kimball
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
