RE: Debian + Verisign's .com/.net hijack

2003-09-17 Thread Boyan Krosnov
It is not hardcoded. A new configuration directive has been added, and it is completely up to the administrator to decide to use it. http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/delegation-only.html Boyan Krosnov, CCIE#8701 http://boyan.ludost.net/ just another techie speaking for himself > -Origi

RE: Debian + Verisign's .com/.net hijack

2003-09-17 Thread Boyan Krosnov
It is not hardcoded. A new configuration directive has been added, and it is completely up to the administrator to decide to use it. http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/delegation-only.html Boyan Krosnov, CCIE#8701 http://boyan.ludost.net/ just another techie speaking for himself > -Origi

RE: Firewall Informer

2003-02-23 Thread Boyan Krosnov
I thought we already have a free tool for the same intended purpose. It was called nmap last time I checked. BR, Boyan Krosnov, CCIE#8701 http://boyan.ludost.net/ just another techie speaking for himself -Original Message- From: Matt Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday

RE: Firewall Informer

2003-02-23 Thread Boyan Krosnov
I thought we already have a free tool for the same intended purpose. It was called nmap last time I checked. BR, Boyan Krosnov, CCIE#8701 http://boyan.ludost.net/ just another techie speaking for himself -Original Message- From: Matt Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday

FW: OpenSSH updates

2003-02-20 Thread Boyan Krosnov
-Original Message- From: Boyan Krosnov Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:48 PM To: 'Odair' Subject: RE: OpenSSH updates you are mixing debian stable with openssh stable. debian stable does not and will never include the latest version of any software, except probably r

FW: OpenSSH updates

2003-02-20 Thread Boyan Krosnov
-Original Message- From: Boyan Krosnov Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:48 PM To: 'Odair' Subject: RE: OpenSSH updates you are mixing debian stable with openssh stable. debian stable does not and will never include the latest version of any software, except probably r

RE: synchronized pings

2002-10-11 Thread Boyan Krosnov
How about an nmap decoy scan with initial ICMP ping of the scanned host, does it explain what you saw ? Did you check all these addresses if they were up at the moment of the .. er .. attack? BR, Boyan Krosnov, CCIE#8701 http://boyan.ludost.net/ Just another techie speaking for himself

RE: synchronized pings

2002-10-10 Thread Boyan Krosnov
How about an nmap decoy scan with initial ICMP ping of the scanned host, does it explain what you saw ? Did you check all these addresses if they were up at the moment of the .. er .. attack? BR, Boyan Krosnov, CCIE#8701 http://boyan.ludost.net/ Just another techie speaking for himself

RE: Debian Security Mirror

2002-09-18 Thread Boyan Krosnov
I also run a public security mirror for myself and everybody interested. I'm interested to know if there is a push mechanism like it is with the ftp.d.o's mirrors. It will be really usefull, cause now I sometimes run it additionally to the cronjob. Best regards, Boyan Krosnov, CCIE

RE: Debian Security Mirror

2002-09-18 Thread Boyan Krosnov
I also run a public security mirror for myself and everybody interested. I'm interested to know if there is a push mechanism like it is with the ftp.d.o's mirrors. It will be really usefull, cause now I sometimes run it additionally to the cronjob. Best regards, Boyan Krosnov, CCIE

RE: question from a newbie regarding possible trojan

2002-09-17 Thread Boyan Krosnov
> Sep 17 00:21:41 :1489 -> 207.46.197.113:80 SYN **S* > Sep 17 00:21:42 :1501 -> 207.46.197.113:80 SYN **S* > Sep 17 00:21:58 :1502 -> 207.46.196.102:80 SYN **S* > Sep 17 00:21:58 :1503 -> 207.46.196.102:80 SYN **S* > Sep 17 00:21:58 :1504 -> 207.68.184.62:80 SYN **S* > Sep 17 0

RE: question from a newbie regarding possible trojan

2002-09-17 Thread Boyan Krosnov
> Sep 17 00:21:41 :1489 -> 207.46.197.113:80 SYN **S* > Sep 17 00:21:42 :1501 -> 207.46.197.113:80 SYN **S* > Sep 17 00:21:58 :1502 -> 207.46.196.102:80 SYN **S* > Sep 17 00:21:58 :1503 -> 207.46.196.102:80 SYN **S* > Sep 17 00:21:58 :1504 -> 207.68.184.62:80 SYN **S* > Sep 17

OT RE: unsubscribe

2002-08-19 Thread Boyan Krosnov
> But all in all you can always send these posts to /dev/null > with procmail. Why not do it on the mailing list server instead on all those inocent recipients? :) starting the next OT flame war on debian lists, Boyan Krosnov, CCIE#8701 http://boyan.ludost.net/ Just another techie speaki