Re: Postfix is spammer-friendly by default on potato and woody

2000-11-02 Thread Borut Mrak
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 02:24:36AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > > mail-abuse.org just test relaying...and postfix fails the test, but doesn't > > it fails? since when? or rather what are you defining as failure? in > my tests it refused to relay each and every attempt from them. The default (

Re: Postfix is spammer-friendly by default on potato and woody

2000-11-02 Thread Borut Mrak
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 01:58:52AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > > MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > well i don't know anyone running postfix who i can ask to test this > with... im certainly not going to go try it without asking ! bad karma > ;-) Hmm...wise decisio

Re: Postfix is spammer-friendly by default on potato and woody

2000-11-02 Thread Borut Mrak
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 02:24:36AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > > mail-abuse.org just test relaying...and postfix fails the test, but doesn't > > it fails? since when? or rather what are you defining as failure? in > my tests it refused to relay each and every attempt from them. The default

Re: Postfix is spammer-friendly by default on potato and woody

2000-11-02 Thread Borut Mrak
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 01:58:52AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > > MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > well i don't know anyone running postfix who i can ask to test this > with... im certainly not going to go try it without asking ! bad karma > ;-) Hmm...wise decisi