Yogesh Sharma, Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:14:52AM -0700:
> As far as my understanding goes, ssh was patched recently for security
> fixes, so it should be coming from security.debian.org not us.debian.org.
> Now security.debian.org is not at all mirrored for security reason than
> how he has 2 diff
Yogesh Sharma, Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:14:52AM -0700:
> As far as my understanding goes, ssh was patched recently for security
> fixes, so it should be coming from security.debian.org not us.debian.org.
> Now security.debian.org is not at all mirrored for security reason than
> how he has 2 diff
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:04:20PM +:
>
> Why the two servers, upgraded from the same server have different ssh
> packages ? The same is with some other packages, e.g.: xfree86-common
>
I noticed the exact same behavior on one of my machines. After a number
of updates apt w
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:04:20PM +:
>
> Why the two servers, upgraded from the same server have different ssh
> packages ? The same is with some other packages, e.g.: xfree86-common
>
I noticed the exact same behavior on one of my machines. After a number
of updates apt w
Robert van der Meulen, Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 04:42:37PM +0100:
>
> Quoting eim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Should I keep my key files unencrypted, or is there another
> > solution which preserves security ?
> Yes, no. (unless you manually start your apache after booting, i.e. not from
> init)
>
htt
Robert van der Meulen, Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 04:42:37PM +0100:
>
> Quoting eim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Should I keep my key files unencrypted, or is there another
> > solution which preserves security ?
> Yes, no. (unless you manually start your apache after booting, i.e. not from
> init)
>
ht
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 03:43:11PM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote:
> > agreed. full disk format and reinstall from backup is the only secure
> ^
>
> This is not safe at all if you mean reinstall programs too. You should
> reinstall programs from th
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 03:43:11PM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote:
> > agreed. full disk format and reinstall from backup is the only secure
> ^
>
> This is not safe at all if you mean reinstall programs too. You should
> reinstall programs from t
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:07:02AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> you've been hacked -> backup -> re-mkfs -> reinstall -> re-config from
> backup very carefully (i.e. file by file) -> restore user data -> do
> some post-mortem with backup -> ensure security -> reopen server to
> public and users -
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:07:02AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> you've been hacked -> backup -> re-mkfs -> reinstall -> re-config from
> backup very carefully (i.e. file by file) -> restore user data -> do
> some post-mortem with backup -> ensure security -> reopen server to
> public and users
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 07:30:56PM +0200, Alson van der Meulen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 10:17:59AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > I'd recommend the former (firewalling on each server). This will let you
> > customize the firewall for that server alone, and spread the packet
> > filtering l
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 07:30:56PM +0200, Alson van der Meulen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 10:17:59AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > I'd recommend the former (firewalling on each server). This will let you
> > customize the firewall for that server alone, and spread the packet
> > filtering
12 matches
Mail list logo
