Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release?

2023-01-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 08:22:15AM -0700 schrieb Sam Hartman: > > Well, if you and a group of people believe you can maintain it in stable > given the additional discussions ith upstream, then explicitly say > you're ready to sign up to maintaining in stable. > I think that's the kind of sing-up-t

Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release?

2023-01-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, it would be great if someone from Security Team might raise some opinion to this question. Kind regards Andreas. Am Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 03:51:10PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 09:38:27PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > src:singularity-container was lying

Yet another list statistics for debian-security

2009-01-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, as you can read in my lightning talk at DebConf http://people.debian.org/~tille/talks/200808_lightning/ I did some investigation on who is frequently posting on our mailing lists. I now created graphs until end of last year and write a short summary for those lists I regard worth a comme

Re: Food for thought - SECURITY (design flaw?)

2001-02-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Carlos Carvalho wrote: > But it would if security patches were incorporated in testing as well. > So I agree with Laz that it's a design bug. > > Note that we're talking about security-relevant packages, which are a > small portion of the total. > > A question: with the chan

Re: Food for thought - SECURITY (design flaw?)

2001-02-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Carlos Carvalho wrote: > But it would if security patches were incorporated in testing as well. > So I agree with Laz that it's a design bug. > > Note that we're talking about security-relevant packages, which are a > small portion of the total. > > A question: with the cha