> > > [terrapin] 08:47:21 ~$ /tmp/a
> > > bash: /tmp/a: Permission denied
>
> > what happens if you do:
>
> > sh -x /tmp/a
>
> Or
> $ cp /bin/echo /tmp
> $ /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /tmp/echo foo
Of course it will work in this case. Please notice that I'm not the man
who suggested to mount /tmp noexec
> > > [terrapin] 08:47:21 ~$ /tmp/a
> > > bash: /tmp/a: Permission denied
>
> > what happens if you do:
>
> > sh -x /tmp/a
>
> Or
> $ cp /bin/echo /tmp
> $ /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /tmp/echo foo
Of course it will work in this case. Please notice that I'm not the man
who suggested to mount /tmp noexe
> That's not my experience. I can only assume your /tmp filesystem,
> like mine, is not vfat-like. Whereas this floppy is:
You probably have some additional settings somewhere (where?).
[terrapin] 02:52:29 ~$ sudo mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 /mnt
[terrapin] 02:52:55 ~$ sudo touch /mnt/a
[terrapin] 02:
> That's not my experience. I can only assume your /tmp filesystem,
> like mine, is not vfat-like. Whereas this floppy is:
You probably have some additional settings somewhere (where?).
[terrapin] 02:52:29 ~$ sudo mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 /mnt
[terrapin] 02:52:55 ~$ sudo touch /mnt/a
[terrapin] 02
> > > noexec has no good purpose, really. But it's intention was for
> > > networked filesystems in certain environments, not a generalized
> > > security tool.
> >
> > It's very useful for mounting filesystems like vfat, where otherwise
> > all the files are marked executable which makes mc a PI
> > > noexec has no good purpose, really. But it's intention was for
> > > networked filesystems in certain environments, not a generalized
> > > security tool.
> >
> > It's very useful for mounting filesystems like vfat, where otherwise
> > all the files are marked executable which makes mc a P
/usr/share/doc/mutt/PGP-Notes.txt.gz
> I am using the same procmail filter and can say that it works
> perfectly for incoming pgp/gpg mails. However, this does not solve the
> problem with other mail clients that want to have inline PGP messages,
> and
> those are many.
> Is there a way to make m
/usr/share/doc/mutt/PGP-Notes.txt.gz
> I am using the same procmail filter and can say that it works
> perfectly for incoming pgp/gpg mails. However, this does not solve the
> problem with other mail clients that want to have inline PGP messages,
> and
> those are many.
> Is there a way to make
> Noticed a weird entry in my firewall logs, it is listed as protocol 54, but
> according to /etc/protocols that doens't exist, anyone know what this is?
NARP -- NBMA Address Resolution Protocol
RFC1735
--
Alexey Vyskubov
(at home)
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your
> Noticed a weird entry in my firewall logs, it is listed as protocol 54, but
> according to /etc/protocols that doens't exist, anyone know what this is?
NARP -- NBMA Address Resolution Protocol
RFC1735
--
Alexey Vyskubov
(at home)
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your
10 matches
Mail list logo
