-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Steve Rudd wrote:
> Daniel Stark asked:
>
> At 01:53 PM 2/20/01 -0800, you wrote:
> >How exactly did you get hacked? Did you leave security wholes large
> >enough for a bus to drive through open? Open your inetd.conf file and #
> >out e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Steve Rudd wrote:
> Daniel Stark asked:
>
> At 01:53 PM 2/20/01 -0800, you wrote:
> >How exactly did you get hacked? Did you leave security wholes large
> >enough for a bus to drive through open? Open your inetd.conf file and #
> >out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Monday 12 February 2001 14:02, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:43:33AM -0200, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> > Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 12 February 2001 11:32:
> > >IMHO people of security team shouldn't spend their time to se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Monday 12 February 2001 14:02, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:43:33AM -0200, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> > Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 12 February 2001 11:32:
> > >IMHO people of security team shouldn't spend their time to s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wednesday 07 February 2001 15:06, Petr Cech wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 07:36:39PM + , Robert Lazzurs wrote:
> > Yea, but should this not be something that is put through straight away,
> > should security update really have to wait with the rest of t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wednesday 07 February 2001 15:06, Petr Cech wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 07:36:39PM + , Robert Lazzurs wrote:
> > Yea, but should this not be something that is put through straight away,
> > should security update really have to wait with the rest of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tuesday 06 February 2001 19:27, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Bradley M Alexander
>
> | I'll tell you why this happens. For the same reason that users tolerate
> | crappy M$ operating systems that have swiss cheese security and no
> | stability. They have been co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tuesday 06 February 2001 19:27, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Bradley M Alexander
>
> | I'll tell you why this happens. For the same reason that users tolerate
> | crappy M$ operating systems that have swiss cheese security and no
> | stability. They have been c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 04 February 2001 21:17, Matthew Sherborne wrote:
> You gave me a brain wave :)
>
> Perhaps email security having four stages:
>
> 1 MIME
> 2 SSL
> 3 SSL + Encrypted storage on mail server
> 4 PGP/GPG/S-MIME
>
> I don't think anyone offers num
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 04 February 2001 21:17, Matthew Sherborne wrote:
> You gave me a brain wave :)
>
> Perhaps email security having four stages:
>
> 1 MIME
> 2 SSL
> 3 SSL + Encrypted storage on mail server
> 4 PGP/GPG/S-MIME
>
> I don't think anyone offers nu
On Friday 02 February 2001 19:49, NDSoftware wrote:
> Where i can find a software for check the packages update ?
> And update the security package.
> thanks
>
> Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
> http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
> UK: Tel +44 84533487
On Friday 02 February 2001 19:49, NDSoftware wrote:
> Where i can find a software for check the packages update ?
> And update the security package.
> thanks
>
> Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
> http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
> UK: Tel +44 8453348
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Friday 02 February 2001 19:08, Philippe BARNETCHE wrote:
> By the way,
> I still don't understand how to handle with mutt the mails that have been
> pgp signed with kmail.
>
> Philippe
>
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 07:03:39PM +
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Dear fellow Debianites,
People talk a lot about security on the net but my efforts to find an ISP
offering e. g. ssl-encrpypted e-mail services have been met by dismal
responses to date, even in the country with the thickest computer population
(ratio computers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Friday 02 February 2001 19:08, Philippe BARNETCHE wrote:
> By the way,
> I still don't understand how to handle with mutt the mails that have been
> pgp signed with kmail.
>
> Philippe
>
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 07:03:39PM +
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Dear fellow Debianites,
People talk a lot about security on the net but my efforts to find an ISP
offering e. g. ssl-encrpypted e-mail services have been met by dismal
responses to date, even in the country with the thickest computer population
(ratio computers
E-(--) Y+>+ PGP t+>++ !5 X-- R>++ tv(+)
> b+(++) DI(+) D++ G>+++ e--> h! !r y>+++
> --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
>
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, A. L. Meyers wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >
> > On Thursday 01 February 2001 07:01, Danie
E-(--) Y+>+ PGP t+>++ !5 X-- R>++ tv(+)
> b+(++) DI(+) D++ G>+++ e--> h! !r y>+++
> --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
>
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, A. L. Meyers wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >
> > On Thursday 01 February 2001 07:01, Danie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thursday 01 February 2001 07:01, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 08:56:24AM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> > G'day,
> > I'm writing this to express my frustration at the slowness Debian
> > seems to be afflicted with when it comes to letting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thursday 01 February 2001 07:01, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 08:56:24AM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> > G'day,
> > I'm writing this to express my frustration at the slowness Debian
> > seems to be afflicted with when it comes to letting
20 matches
Mail list logo
