Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)

2024-11-27 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Salvatore, On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 at 20:02, Samuel Henrique wrote: > On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 at 19:43, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > As mentioned in an earlier message: What I would love to see is to > > actually have a substate which makes the situation clear, and still > > beeing technically c

Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition

2024-11-27 Thread Leandro Cunha
Hi, On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 7:21 PM Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > Hi, > > while investigating a test failure in ksh93u+m, it became clear that > packages last built before the time_t-64bit transition can have > latent bugs. > They might very well now FTBFS or fail at runtime (autopkgtest time > o

Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition

2024-11-27 Thread Martin
On 2024-08-16 10:25, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > Martin, I think you and your employer were looking for ways to help the > armhf/armel ports. This looks like a great one! :) Noted ;-)