Re: Setting APT::Default-Release prevents installation of security updates in bookworm!?

2023-07-22 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 03:56:02PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > You will have to ask the apt developers and archive admins about this, > but at the end of the day reverting it is unlikely to happen, so > probably it is something everyone will just have to learn to live with. What about to add a warni

Re: Setting APT::Default-Release prevents installation of security updates in bookworm!?

2023-07-22 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi Paul, On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 03:56:02PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > One mention I found is in Raphaël and Roland's DAH (now in CC): > > https://debian-handbook.info/browse/stable/sect.apt-get.html#sect.apt-upgrade > > Probably better to file a bug about this, so it is tracked. Ah, I didn't r

Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.1)

2023-07-22 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 08:24:31PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > The first point release for "bookworm" (12.1) is scheduled for Saturday, > July 22nd. Processing of new uploads into bookworm-proposed-updates will be > frozen during the preceding weekend. The archive side of the point release

Re: Setting APT::Default-Release prevents installation of security updates in bookworm!?

2023-07-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2023-07-21 at 11:04 +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote: > Do you have any references on how this decision came to be? I think it was about making the suite naming more intuitive, consistent with other suites and possibly also some dak implementation concerns. > One mention I found is in Raphaël