On 17/04/2022 19:26, Satvik Sinha wrote:
> abusing your OS's reputation?
i believe the answer is in the question. debian is based on distributed trust.
i did the analysis (took 3 weeks): it is literally the only distro in the world
with an inviolate chain of trust from a large keyring datin
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 09:07:10AM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> That is not correct. You can make use of SSE instructions also in
> x86_32/i386 mode.
>
> I found f.i.:
> https://gcc.gcc.gnu.narkive.com/k0KqaZF2/i386-sse-test-question
Well x86_64 uses it all the time, not just optionally,
Hi,guys and Good Day! So in recent days ,it was observed that many open
source contributors vandalised their or someone else's project's
reputation to show agendas of Russia-Ukraine war, Some even vandalised
their project to destroy system in Russia and Belarus (Node-ipc being one
of them) that af
Just make sure you comment out the tests. It will greatly speed up
compilation and one of these tests was even hanging two times:
./a.out -test.short -test.timeout=240s
It is a known Debian Bug that the Go tests (a programming language)
fail with with gcc-8. If not you would have to connect
Likely it is possible to comment out the tournament checks after
compilation (which did not succeed to find this error any way) in
debian/rules; I would do it like this:
check:
check22: $(check_stamp)
$(check_stamp): $(build_stamp)
$(MAKE) -f debian/rules2 $@
(here I have renamed chec
I have now downloaded the source package and examined the backtrace
of building Firefox and examined all the differences between gcc 8.3.0-1
(known bad from Debian10) and gcc 9.2.0 with gcc 9.2.1 being known to be
good for moc/Qt5 from Ubuntu 19.10. There was only one difference I
found along
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 10:05:39AM +0200, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote:
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 2
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.00GHz
stepping : 4
cpu MHz : 1993.656
cache size : 512 KB
?
Celeron 440 for sure is 64-
On 4/17/22 4:52 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Elmar Stellnberger (2022-04-17):
I haven´t heard yet of a Pentium IV supporting amd64.
Likely it does not exist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_4_processors seems
to disagree in general. Willamette seems to be old enough to be
Elmar Stellnberger (2022-04-17):
> I haven´t heard yet of a Pentium IV supporting amd64.
> Likely it does not exist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_4_processors seems
to disagree in general. Willamette seems to be old enough to be 32-bit
only though.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brule
I haven´t heard yet of a Pentium IV supporting amd64.
Likely it does not exist.
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 10:05:39AM +0200, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> piorunz:
> > On 12/04/2022 04:59, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote:
> > > You mean, that it is poss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
piorunz:
On 12/04/2022 04:59, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote:
You mean, that it is possible to run amd64 on my old hardware
1#
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 22
model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU
11 matches
Mail list logo
