Steve McIntyre (2019-03-04):
> And Mark says:
>
> "we don't want to go rewinding version numbers in unstable; that could
> lead to all sorts of unforeseeable breakage.
>
> much as we'd expected. Any more feedback please? Cyril prefers
> approach #2 below, I prefer #3.
To clarify: #2 was my pref
I've had a reply from Mark (ftpteam) in IRC:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 11:35:45PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
...
>So, we're looking at three hacky options options here to work our way
>out of this hole. In (probably?) descending order of hackitude:
>
>1. Ask the nice ftpmaster people to
Hi,
I'm working on CVE-2018-16868/CVE-2018-16869, a side-channel attack that
affects gnutls and nettle, disclosed 2018-12, tagged low/local.
Unlike what I read in data/CVE/list, I understand that the nettle fix is
not just a new function - it's a rewrite of the RSA functions,
completemented by a
3 matches
Mail list logo
