On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 8:50 AM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> First of all thank you for the whole team for keeping Debian as secure
> as the people on the team do to keep Debian free from controversy ( at
> least from the security viewpoint) .
A few clarifications:
debian-security@lists.debian.org is
addition at bottom :-
On 16/08/2018, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> First of all thank you for the whole team for keeping Debian as secure
> as the people on the team do to keep Debian free from controversy ( at
> least from the security viewpoint) .
>
> Please CC me as I'm not subscribed t
Dear all,
First of all thank you for the whole team for keeping Debian as secure
as the people on the team do to keep Debian free from controversy ( at
least from the security viewpoint) .
Please CC me as I'm not subscribed to the mailing list, sorry.
I just came upon sandsifter today. While I h
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 04:02:59PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 14.08.18 21:52, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > CVE-2018-5391 (FragmentSmack)
> >
> >Juha-Matti Tilli discovered a flaw in the way the Linux kernel
> >handled reassembly of fragmented IPv4 and IPv
Hello,
On 14.08.18 21:52, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
CVE-2018-5391 (FragmentSmack)
Juha-Matti Tilli discovered a flaw in the way the Linux kernel
handled reassembly of fragmented IPv4 and IPv6 packets. A remote
attacker can take advantage of this flaw to trigger time and
calculatio
5 matches
Mail list logo