I think there is an Apparmor progress page, no?
https://wiki.debian.org/AppArmor/Progress
Just wondering, if you like Fedora/RH SELinux & AppArmor
implementation better, then why not just stick to deploying them?
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:49 PM, stefano frabetti
wrote:
>> He, and those like me,
> He, and those like me, deserve a polite/germane/relevant response.
Bravo! +1
On 9/23/2016 12:42 PM, Reed Black wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Jonathan Hutchins
mailto:hutch...@tarcanfel.org>> wrote:
It is difficult for me to rationalize a serious concern for
"security"
with the idea that one should lie back and expect the
packaging team to
ta
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Jonathan Hutchins
wrote:
> It is difficult for me to rationalize a serious concern for "security"
> with the idea that one should lie back and expect the packaging team to
> take care of it all for you. If you are concerned with security, you
> should be actively
It is difficult for me to rationalize a serious concern for "security"
with the idea that one should lie back and expect the packaging team to
take care of it all for you. If you are concerned with security, you
should be actively configuring security features yourself, not expecting
that someone
Hi everybody,
is there already some evidence about security improvements in the upcoming
Debian release? I took a look at the security feature page in the Wiki [1] but
Stretch is not listed there. Furthermore, the list is not as complete as the
list of Fedora [2]. Is there somebody with an insig
Hi everybody,
is there already some evidence about security improvements in the upcoming
Debian release? I took a look at the security feature page in the Wiki [1] but
Stretch is not listed there. Furthermore, the list is not as complete as the
list of Fedora [2]. Is there somebody with an insig
7 matches
Mail list logo
