On May 17, 2016 22:54, "Ralph Sanchez" wrote:
>
> This doesn't make any sense to me. I'm in the graphical install for
Jessie in manual mode and no matter what I do I can't create and encrypted
volume containing any of the other lvm directories or groups. Only if I
choose entire disk lvm with encry
This doesn't make any sense to me. I'm in the graphical install for Jessie
in manual mode and no matter what I do I can't create and encrypted volume
containing any of the other lvm directories or groups. Only if I choose
entire disk lvm with encrypted, which isn't what I want at all and is
unmodif
I don't understand. I'm at the partitioning phase of the GUI install, but
it won't let me change the sizes of any partition but boot so I can't
create a free space.
On Tuesday, May 17, 2016, Ralph Sanchez wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: *Ralph Sanchez* >
> Date: Tue
I made this mistake my first time editing my depository list, if that's
what's going on here.
On Sunday, May 15, 2016, Frank Pikelner wrote:
> Andy,
>
> My mistake, time for a coffee appreciate the help.
>
> Best,
>
> Frank
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Andy Smith > wrote:
> >
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Ralph Sanchez*
Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2016
Subject: Dual-Boot w/ encryption
To: "H."
Cool. I'd like to start from scratch again anyway, now that I have a
much better understanding of the actual set-up and securing of both
distros. I think I'm going
Indeed you can make your life easier by starting from the scratch and not
assigning the full disk to one system.
Re-sizing can however be done also from the console and a live distro, as
mentioned.
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ResizeEncryptedPartitions
or
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php
My opinion might not mean much, but as a user, I agree with this. If
i'm installing from the stable depository, we expect certain things
from packages there and everything must be held to those guidelines.
And mostly if we are using it from unstable, we are hoping to see it
evolve into being put in
H. Thanks alot, that's definitely a clear and concise guide to
doing what I want to do. Just as a question, does it make it simple if
I start from ''scratch'' as I don't have much data to backup, and I
can't repartition my current install due to it already being LUKS
encrypted and gparted not s
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 04:02:37PM +0800, seamli...@gmail.com wrote:
BoringSSL is also free software, as long as there are maintainers who
are willing to spend time on it, I think it has rights to exist in
Debian. Well I have been contributing to Debian for not long, so
please point me out my mis
Hey,
I'm using this setup frequently. First I'd advice you to get familiar with how
to set up a single fully encrypted disk. You should know if you want two
cryptfs each in a single partition and then your LVM or common disk layout
inside each of the cryptfs partitions or if you want to have an lvm
Ok, awesome, this looks pretty promising. Thanks for the reading
materials, it's giving me a good idea of how this should work. I don't
mind setting up both partitions/boots under one encryption, as seems
to be the simplest route described in the one link, as both options
outlined have the same bas
On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 09:24 -0400, Ralph Sanchez wrote:
> Kind of a green user,just wandering if it's possible to perform a
> dual
> boot with two linux/debian OS's and still use full disk encryption,
> or
> encrypt the seperate partitions and how this works if so.
Hi,
Yes, it is possible to have f
Sure thing. GRUB supports LUKS, and you'll need to set up both Debians
for LUKS as well. I know how to do this on Archlinux, but not Debian.
On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 09:24 -0400, Ralph Sanchez wrote:
> Kind of a green user,just wandering if it's possible to perform a
> dual
> boot with two linux/deb
Kind of a green user,just wandering if it's possible to perform a dual
boot with two linux/debian OS's and still use full disk encryption, or
encrypt the seperate partitions and how this works if so.
Previous-Subject: Re: Will Packaging BoringSSL Bring Any Trouble to the
Security Team?
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 04:02:37PM +0800, ? wrote:
> ...
> This package places BoringSSL in a private directory which is isolated
> to other libraries, and only Android SDK is using the libraries.
Plea
Hi all,
Sorry for posting to a general channel. I didn't know that :(
BoringSSL is also free software, as long as there are maintainers who
are willing to spend time on it, I think it has rights to exist in
Debian. Well I have been contributing to Debian for not long, so
please point me out my mi
16 matches
Mail list logo
