Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3148-1] chromium-browser end of life

Thank you very much Paul for the reply. Kind regards, Pavlos *Pavlos K. Ponos* View Pavlos K. Ponos's profile on LinkedIn On 02/02/2015 09:45 PM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Op 02-02-15 om 20:13 schreef Pavlos K. Ponos: Hello list! Thank you

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3148-1] chromium-browser end of life

Op 02-02-15 om 20:13 schreef Pavlos K. Ponos: > Hello list! > > Thank you very much for the detailed feedback :) > One last question with regards to the following quote, till the next > stable release would we have security issues with Iceweasel and Icedove > too?(!) I don't know, I expect it wil

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3148-1] chromium-browser end of life

Hello list! Thank you very much for the detailed feedback :) One last question with regards to the following quote, till the next stable release would we have security issues with Iceweasel and Icedove too?(!) Regards, Pavlos On 02/02/2015

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3148-1] chromium-browser end of life

> Or use the the (non-free) Chrome DEBs provided by Google. Did they stop to put their servers into /etc/apt/sources.list before installing and, even worse, after de-installing? They did the last time I (un-)installed Chrome. - Sebastian -- Ich setzte einen Fuß in die Luft, und sie trug.

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3148-1] chromium-browser end of life

Paul Wise schrieb: >> So, what are the alternatives in our case? > > Upgrade to jessie or switch to another web browser. Or use the the (non-free) Chrome DEBs provided by Google. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "uns

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3148-1] chromium-browser end of life

Op 02-02-15 om 04:44 schreef Michael Gilbert: > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Russell Coker wrote: >> On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 11:18:43 PM Paul Wise wrote: >>> chromium was already being backported to wheezy for security updates, >>> the latest versions need newer compilers so we can't backport any >>>