On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 14:15 -0600, Kitty Cat wrote:
> These torrents are not working with the Debian tracker.
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.6.0/source/bt-cd/debian-update-7.6.0-source-CD-1.iso.torrent
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.6.0/source/bt-cd/debian-update-7.6.0-sourc
These torrents are not working with the Debian tracker.
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.6.0/source/bt-cd/debian-update-7.6.0-source-CD-1.iso.torrent
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.6.0/source/bt-cd/debian-update-7.6.0-source-CD-2.iso.torrent
Torrent Editor and also my Torrent softwa
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 01:22:10PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Or, you could make use of the Check-Valid-Until and Min-ValidTime options in
apt.conf. There's a reason things are done the way they are, and you probably
aren't going to find a lot of interest in getting people to do a lot o
On 07/14/2014 01:12 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:45:38PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> One place that this will help a lot is managing completely offline machines,
>> like machines for running secure build and signing processes. Right now, in
>> order to instal
On 07/14/2014 12:59 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> I'd like to contribute to this effort
>
> First thing is to get #733029 fixed, which involves disabling signing
> by default (signing should be done after testing not before) and
> ad
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:45:38PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
One place that this will help a lot is managing completely offline machines,
like machines for running secure build and signing processes. Right now, in
order to install a package securely on an offline machine, I have to ma
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I'd like to contribute to this effort
First thing is to get #733029 fixed, which involves disabling signing
by default (signing should be done after testing not before) and
adding a signing tool to dpkg-dev. Then debsign/debuild ne
On 07/14/2014 12:31 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> I agree that .deb packages should be individually signed
> ...
>> This has been discussed in the past. I really think it is just a
>> matter of someone doing the work.
>
> The work h
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I agree that .deb packages should be individually signed
...
> This has been discussed in the past. I really think it is just a
> matter of someone doing the work.
The work has been done many years ago and has been in the archive
I agree that .deb packages should be individually signed, but I don't think
that the current apt system is vulnerable to package corruption.
Having a signature in the .deb. would make things a lot more flexible in
terms of distribution because a .deb could be verified no matter how it ends
up on
Djones Boni <07ea86b...@gmail.com> (2014-07-14):
> The Debian 7.6 update ISO hashes are missing on bt-dvd directory.
> http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.6.0/amd64/bt-dvd/MD5SUMS
> http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.6.0/*/bt-dvd/MD5SUMS
>
> They can be found in iso-dvd and jigdo-dvd.
> http:
The Debian 7.6 update ISO hashes are missing on bt-dvd directory.
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.6.0/amd64/bt-dvd/MD5SUMS
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.6.0/*/bt-dvd/MD5SUMS
They can be found in iso-dvd and jigdo-dvd.
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.6.0/amd64/iso-dvd/MD5SUMS
ht
12 matches
Mail list logo
