On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Curtis wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Michael web site with a statistic I've watching for time to
> time. Also Debian Hardening wiki page I studied a couple of
> time.
>
>> There is a lintian check for setuid binaries (...)
>> There isn't really any group effo
Hi all,
I'm taking this opportunity to share a bit about my experience and
plans for improving AppArmor support in Debian => cc'ing the
potentially interested parties: AppArmor maintainer in Debian,
upstream mailing-list, Tails developers and Jake. If I've forgotten
someone, I'm sorry, please forw
Hello everyone,
Michael web site with a statistic I've watching for time to
time. Also *Debian* Hardening wiki page I studied a couple of
time.
*>*
*There is a lintian check for setuid binaries (...) **>*
* There isn't really any group effort tackling or monitoring **>*
* the assortment of useful
Hi,
Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote (02 Jan 2014 18:31:07 GMT) :
> The following packages have had a DSA in the previous years, but do
> not use hardened build flags.
Thanks for updating the list!
> pixman
Patch submitted (#733986).
> libotr
I'll take care of that one too.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Michael Gilbert schrieb:
> There isn't really any group effort tackling or monitoring the
> assortment of useful hardening features. That is something that could
> definitely be improved.
Here's some concrete issues where people can help out. Many of these
tasks will take less than an hour and y
Paul Wise:> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:34 PM, adrelanos wrote:
>
>> I am wondering how excited the apt developers would be about adding a
>> bash script to their app. I'll see how far I get and contact them when
>> there is something to talk about.
>
> I suppose POSIX shell would be preferable.
I a
6 matches
Mail list logo
