Re: There is Pidgin in security updates with same version but different checksum

2013-10-03 Thread Marko Randjelovic
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 01:52:44 +0200 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Marko Randjelovic (2013-10-04): > > The package from security looks like error because it does not appear > > in apt-cache show, but exists in lists file and in > > http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/p/pidgin/. > > Can you ple

Re: There is Pidgin in security updates with same version but different checksum

2013-10-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Marko Randjelovic (2013-10-04): > The package from security looks like error because it does not appear > in apt-cache show, but exists in lists file and in > http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/p/pidgin/. Can you please elaborate? The above has got: 2.7.3-1+squeeze3 Current status acro

There is Pidgin in security updates with same version but different checksum

2013-10-03 Thread Marko Randjelovic
The package from security looks like error because it does not appear in apt-cache show, but exists in lists file and in http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/p/pidgin/. Regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Re: Security updates realized by new releases, case for backports?

2013-10-03 Thread Marko Randjelovic
On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 21:08:28 +0200 Paul van der Vlis wrote: > So far I know browsers like Konqueror, Epiphany and Midory do not have > real security support in Debian. See: > http://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#browser-security I have taken a look at

Re: Security updates realized by new releases, case for backports?

2013-10-03 Thread Marko Randjelovic
On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 18:46:33 +0300 Riku Valli wrote: > Konqueror isn't solution, because most websites check you browser > strings and uses flash, javascript and so on. Yes, i know at i can > change these strings, but most in cases this isn't enough if i like > use this website. Unfortunately, t

Re: Security updates realized by new releases, case for backports?

2013-10-03 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Op 03-10-13 17:46, Riku Valli schreef: (...) > I used Debian stable my everyday use and this sitation how iceweasel and > icedove now is upgreded is good for me. This quite good compromize with > usability and convience. Remember, Debian version is ESR and not latest > one. I am used stable over

Re: Security updates realized by new releases, case for backports?

2013-10-03 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Op 03-10-13 16:44, Marko Randjelovic schreef: > On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 14:37:22 +0200 Paul van der Vlis > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> In some cases security updates for packages in main are realized >> by new releases, e.g. Iceweasel and Wordpress. Such packages can >> give problems, e.g. in Wordpress

Re: Security updates realized by new releases, case for backports?

2013-10-03 Thread Riku Valli
On 10/03/2013 05:44 PM, Marko Randjelovic wrote: > On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 14:37:22 +0200 > Paul van der Vlis wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> In some cases security updates for packages in main are realized by >> new releases, e.g. Iceweasel and Wordpress. Such packages can give >> problems, e.g. in Wordpre

Re: Security updates realized by new releases, case for backports?

2013-10-03 Thread Marko Randjelovic
On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 14:37:22 +0200 Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Hello, > > In some cases security updates for packages in main are realized by > new releases, e.g. Iceweasel and Wordpress. Such packages can give > problems, e.g. in Wordpress there are missing themes. > > In my opinion such packag

Security updates realized by new releases, case for backports?

2013-10-03 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Hello, In some cases security updates for packages in main are realized by new releases, e.g. Iceweasel and Wordpress. Such packages can give problems, e.g. in Wordpress there are missing themes. In my opinion such packages should be added to backports and then declared "end of live" in main. I t