Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 2695-1] chromium-browser security update

On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Nick Boyce wrote: > On Sunday 02 Jun 2013 16:13:43 Michael Gilbert wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Nick Boyce wrote: >> >> > On Wednesday 29 May 2013 15:23:54 Michael Gilbert wrote: >> > >> >> or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 2695-1] chromium-browser security update

On Sunday 02 Jun 2013 16:13:43 Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Nick Boyce wrote: > > > On Wednesday 29 May 2013 15:23:54 Michael Gilbert wrote: > > > >> or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors. > > > > I'm just wondering ... is that Google language

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 2695-1] chromium-browser security update

On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Nick Boyce wrote: > On Wednesday 29 May 2013 15:23:54 Michael Gilbert wrote: > >> or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors. > > I'm just wondering ... is that Google language for "or possibly allow remote > code execution" ? > > The phrase occurs

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 2695-1] chromium-browser security update

On Wednesday 29 May 2013 15:23:54 Michael Gilbert wrote: > or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors. I'm just wondering ... is that Google language for "or possibly allow remote code execution" ? The phrase occurs for many of the vulnerabilities listed in the advisory, and