Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade

2011-03-31 Thread Jens Schüßler
* Thomas Hungenberg wrote: > Piotr Drozdek wrote: > > Show me results of > > apt-cache policy tex-common > > tex-common: > Installed: 2.08 > Candidate: 2.08.1 > Version table: > 2.08.1 0 > 500 http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates/main i386 Packages > *** 2.08 0 >

Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade

2011-03-31 Thread Thomas Hungenberg
Piotr Drozdek wrote: > Show me results of > apt-cache policy tex-common tex-common: Installed: 2.08 Candidate: 2.08.1 Version table: 2.08.1 0 500 http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates/main i386 Packages *** 2.08 0 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main

Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade

2011-03-31 Thread Thomas Hungenberg
Hector Oron wrote: > Can you check which it is the status of tex-common, is it held by any > reason? aptitude frontend it is very good to find out such things. 'aptitude search ~ahold' returns no results. $ dpkg -l tex-common Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files

Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade

2011-03-31 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:44:59 -0400 Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:28:21 +0100 Hector Oron wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > 2011/3/31 Riku Valli : > > > > > apt-get is now preferred method over aptitude at Squeeze. However at > > > Lenny aptitude is preferred over apt-get. > > > > > > Y

Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade

2011-03-31 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:28:21 +0100 Hector Oron wrote: > Hi, > > 2011/3/31 Riku Valli : > > > apt-get is now preferred method over aptitude at Squeeze. However at > > Lenny aptitude is preferred over apt-get. > > > > You should use apt-get with Squeeze and aptitude with Lenny. > > It is recommen

Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade

2011-03-31 Thread Piotr Drozdek
Dnia 2011-03-31, o godz. 14:49:19 Thomas Hungenberg napisał(a): > Hi, > > since upgrading from lenny to squeeze, I've noticed several times > that aptitude does not install all available security updates whereas > apt-get does. > > Currently, this looks like: > > # aptitude -s upgrade > The fo

Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade

2011-03-31 Thread Hector Oron
Hi, 2011/3/31 Riku Valli : > apt-get is now preferred method over aptitude at Squeeze. However at > Lenny aptitude is preferred over apt-get. > > You should use apt-get with Squeeze and aptitude with Lenny. It is recommended on the release-notes for the upgrade from lenny to squeeze. Aptitude sh

Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade

2011-03-31 Thread Riku Valli
On 03/31/2011 04:23 PM, Benedikt Hallinger wrote: > Hi, > i noticed that too and switched back to apt-get for that reason. Hi apt-get is now preferred method over aptitude at Squeeze. However at Lenny aptitude is preferred over apt-get. You should use apt-get with Squeeze and aptitude with Lenny.

Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade

2011-03-31 Thread Benedikt Hallinger
Hi, i noticed that too and switched back to apt-get for that reason. On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:49:19 +0200, Thomas Hungenberg wrote: Hi, since upgrading from lenny to squeeze, I've noticed several times that aptitude does not install all available security updates whereas apt-get does. Curre

aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade

2011-03-31 Thread Thomas Hungenberg
Hi, since upgrading from lenny to squeeze, I've noticed several times that aptitude does not install all available security updates whereas apt-get does. Currently, this looks like: # aptitude -s upgrade The following packages will be upgraded: bind9-host dnsutils libbind9-60 libdns69 libisc62

Tomcat 5.5 Vulnerabilities

2011-03-31 Thread Johan Karlsson
Hi, I'm trying to figure the Tomcat 5.5 Security Update that was announced on the security announce list yesterday: - Package: tomcat5.5 Vulnerability : several Problem type : remote Debian-specific: no CVE ID : CVE-2008-5515 CVE-2009-0033 CVE-2009-