Maybe the all of that starting point was obviously out of the scope of this
mailing list, but it seems to catch the interest of everyone seeing how many
answers have been posted.
Just stop with all that rubbish and get back to the main topic : security in
Debian.
- Reply message -
De
Zgłoszenie zmodyfikowane 2010-12-14 08:20:23
, przez [kw] Krzysztof Wajda
Początek
Komentarze
Opis
Firma:
ONTP.NET Sp. z o.o.
System:
Serwis
Kategoria:
Centrale i faksy
Typ:
Problem
Priorytet:
3
Status:
Otwarty
Postanowienie:
Zakończono:
Przypis
Am Montag 13 Dezember 2010 schrieb Emanuele Petrucci :
> BTW here there are several methods,
>
> anyone giving you some information, some redundant:
>
> $ lsb_release -a
> $ cat /proc/version ; # this largely include "uname -a"
> $ cat /etc/debian_version
Hi everyone!
That's funny!
I'm run
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 23:33, Andrew McGlashan
wrote:
> Chris Wadge wrote:
>>>
>>> PS: I've solved my problem. Thanks to those that actually helped.
>
> Besides all the noise, the "version of Lenny" can be directly relevant to
> the security of the installation ... and therefore it could technica
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Chris Wadge wrote:
Well, you have my apologies, for whatever that's worth. I hate seeing
exchanges like this. In the time it takes to tell somebody to "Google it",
one could have simply replied with the correct answer. It's also worth noting
that while search engines somet
Chris Wadge wrote:
PS: I've solved my problem. Thanks to those that actually helped.
Besides all the noise, the "version of Lenny" can be directly relevant
to the security of the installation ... and therefore it could
technically and possibly correctly (don't care for the debate on this
tho
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 22:50, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> From what I can tell debian-security is listed under [2]User and not under
> [3]Developer lists, so it stands to reason that users should be encouraged
> to seek assistance from this list's members.
>
> 2. http://lists.debian.org/users.html
>Fr
Ash Narayanan wrote:
Wow, what has this thread turned into!?
It started off as a simple question that could have been answered with
one of two possible replies, namely, the solution itself or a
suggestion to move this query to a more appropriate mailing list.
Thank you to all of you whose rep
Well, you have my apologies, for whatever that's worth. I hate seeing
exchanges like this. In the time it takes to tell somebody to "Google
it", one could have simply replied with the correct answer. It's also
worth noting that while search engines sometimes seem magical, they're
simply indexin
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 20:12, Ash Narayanan wrote:
> Can you imagine stepping in to a pet *security* store with a question about
> your
> pets *health* symptoms to be abused by the store attendant for not going to a
> vet instead?
^ There, I fixed it for you.
-Jim P.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Wow, what has this thread turned into!?
It started off as a simple question that could have been answered with one
of two possible replies, namely, the solution itself or a suggestion to move
this query to a more appropriate mailing list. Thank you to all of you whose
replies fell in either of the
Ashvin Narayanan wrote:
This probably isn't the best place to ask but I couldn't find a better one.
How do I obtain information about my Lenny installation? Is there a
command that tells me the version number?
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-software.en.html#s-isitdebian
htt
Le lundi 13 décembre 2010 à 08:29 -0800, Account for Debian group mail a
écrit :
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> > * Debian security:
> >
> >> Is there any plan to upgrade the bind version in debian to 9.6-ESV-R3
> >> which correct the bugs?
> >
> > There was a technical issue wi
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Account for Debian group mail:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Debian security:
Is there any plan to upgrade the bind version in debian to 9.6-ESV-R3
which correct the bugs?
There was a technical issue with the update process, whi
* Account for Debian group mail:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> * Debian security:
>>
>>> Is there any plan to upgrade the bind version in debian to 9.6-ESV-R3
>>> which correct the bugs?
>>
>> There was a technical issue with the update process, which has been
>> resolved now.
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Debian security:
Is there any plan to upgrade the bind version in debian to 9.6-ESV-R3
which correct the bugs?
There was a technical issue with the update process, which has been
resolved now. Updates will be released in due course.
Hello,
I
BTW here there are several methods,
anyone giving you some information, some redundant:
$ lsb_release -a
$ cat /proc/version ; # this largely include "uname -a"
$ cat /etc/debian_version
Emanuele Petrucci
=
http://kysmor.com
kys...@kysmor.com
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 02:18, Andrew McGlashan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Chris Bannister wrote:
>> Naturally, I assume you would do a google first!!! Just think, in a few
>> years time if someone googles your name, will they think you
>> ignorant/lazy and not able to use a search engine?
>
> I don't under
Anh K. Huynh wrote:
You may try "cat /etc/debian_version"
Thank you, I'm sure that perfectly answers the OP's question exactly and
very clearly.
Cheers
A.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:18:25 +1100
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 03:05:45PM +1030, Ashvin Narayanan wrote:
> >> Thanks Jim/Michael for taking time to show me how to use Google
> >> instead of simply pointing me to debian-users.
> >
> > Natu
20 matches
Mail list logo
