* Michael Gilbert:
> The problem here appears to be the jump to the new upstream version
> (1.8.2 to 1.8.13), which has a different dependency set.
The actual problem was that the dependency set was initially different
(it included additional, incorrect dependencies). This was corrected,
and upg
Thank you all for your kind responses. I think I have a much better
understanding of the Debian security process now.
Some out-of-context excerpts below.
- Marsh
On 10/12/2010 05:10 AM, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
And it might be non-obvious, but some CPUs (e.g. the one in my
not-so-old laptop)
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 05:48:23AM -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> Last I checked there were ways of carrying multiple Kernels and enabling
> them on need-be basis
Oh, sure. I'm just pointing out that the performance hit one experiences
with PAE is not the only factor to take into consideration whe
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 11:35 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> What's ubiquity?
Read the follow up email where I corrected mistake please...
> Enable what? Last time I checked, a given kernel image either user PAE
> or not, there was no flag to control it.
You read to much into the subjective usage
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 05:29:03AM -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 11:10 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > And it might be non-obvious, but some CPUs (e.g. the one in my
> > not-so-old laptop) don't support PAE, so making the default kernel use
> > PAE would make debian unbootab
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 05:29 -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 11:10 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > And it might be non-obvious, but some CPUs (e.g. the one in my
> > not-so-old laptop) don't support PAE, so making the default kernel use
> > PAE would make debian unbootable on t
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 11:10 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> And it might be non-obvious, but some CPUs (e.g. the one in my
> not-so-old laptop) don't support PAE, so making the default kernel use
> PAE would make debian unbootable on them.
Because it's too hard to have ubiquity run a script that ch
On 10/12/2010 03:10 AM, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:08:04PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Monday, October 11, 2010 17:18:34 you wrote:
On 10/11/2010 12:21 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
What can be done to not disable page protections in the default
kernel?
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:08:04PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Monday, October 11, 2010 17:18:34 you wrote:
> >On 10/11/2010 12:21 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >>> What can be done to not disable page protections in the default
> >>> kernel?
> >>
> >> Enable PAE. From what I
9 matches
Mail list logo
