On August 6, 2010, Scott Edwards wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Gordon Haverland
>
> wrote:
> > I wrote a program to help install a package, which makes use
> > of effective UID changes. And Proc::UID fits those
> > requirements nicely.
> >
> > On my computer (Debian/unstable), Proc::
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Gordon Haverland
wrote:
> I wrote a program to help install a package, which makes use of
> effective UID changes. And Proc::UID fits those requirements
> nicely.
>
> On my computer (Debian/unstable), Proc::UID compiles and installs
> fine. On another computer (De
I wrote a program to help install a package, which makes use of
effective UID changes. And Proc::UID fits those requirements
nicely.
On my computer (Debian/unstable), Proc::UID compiles and installs
fine. On another computer (Debian/stable), the SUID test (04) and
the SGID test (05) both fai
..@debian.org
>August 6th, 2010http://www.debian.org/News/2010/20100806
>
I'm wondering if this means Squeeze will soon be receiving the same level of
support of the security team as Lenny currently
4 matches
Mail list logo