Re: UNS: Debian 4.0 Upgrade Path

2010-01-23 Thread Jens Schüßler
* Thiemo Nagel wrote: > Dear Johannes, > > On 01/22/2010 11:27 PM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: >> A typical Debian upgrade will lead to >> a downtime on the order of a few minutes once every 2 years, compared to >> tedious manual reinstallation required on other systems. It is >> straightforward to

Re: UNS: Debian 4.0 Upgrade Path

2010-01-23 Thread Thiemo Nagel
Dear Moritz, On 01/22/2010 07:14 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On 2010-01-22, Thiemo Nagel wrote: The Security Team has discussed and stated before: If large institutions want a longer support cycle for oldstable they should colloborate to fund this externally. Supporting oldstable releases for

Re: UNS: Debian 4.0 Upgrade Path

2010-01-23 Thread Thiemo Nagel
Dear Johannes, On 01/22/2010 11:27 PM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: A typical Debian upgrade will lead to a downtime on the order of a few minutes once every 2 years, compared to tedious manual reinstallation required on other systems. It is straightforward to semi-automatically upgrade some 100 m

Re: UNS: Debian 4.0 Upgrade Path

2010-01-23 Thread Thiemo Nagel
However if that is the case, I wonder if oldstable support could be extended for some more time. But why? There is a *stable* release with security support. Debian isn't made for skipping a whole release. And the end of support for etch was announced long ago, so that everyone had enough time to