On Monday, 2009-08-10 at 14:35:06 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Lupe Christoph [090810 13:53]:
> > On Monday, 2009-08-10 at 13:46:38 +0200, Thomas Liske wrote:
> > > last week, there was an article on heise security about MTAs[1] which
> > > relay mails for hosts having a reverse resolutio
* Lupe Christoph [090810 13:53]:
> On Monday, 2009-08-10 at 13:46:38 +0200, Thomas Liske wrote:
>
> > last week, there was an article on heise security about MTAs[1] which
> > relay mails for hosts having a reverse resolution of 'localhost'. Doing
> > a small test shows that sendmail on etch
I guess I will run apt-get upgrade everywhereit's available on drepo
as of this morning.
Shawn Henson
CTR-EDS, an HP Company
DMLSS/JMLFDC/IST
1681 Nelson St, Ft Detrick, MD 21702
DSN 343-9712, COM 301-619-9712,
FAX 301-619-7831
-Original Message-
From: Florian Weimer [mailto:f...
* Jan de Groot [090810 14:22]:
> On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 14:03 +0200, Thomas Liske wrote:
> > if an access line like:
> >
> > Connect:localhost RELAY
> >
> > turns a MTA into an Open Relay than I would prefere a DSA, since the
> > ACL
> > implementation is broken IMHO.
>
> As long as r
Re,
Jan de Groot wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 14:03 +0200, Thomas Liske wrote:
if an access line like:
Connect:localhost RELAY
turns a MTA into an Open Relay than I would prefere a DSA, since the
ACL
implementation is broken IMHO.
As long as reverse DNS can be faked, I would
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 14:03 +0200, Thomas Liske wrote:
> if an access line like:
>
> Connect:localhost RELAY
>
> turns a MTA into an Open Relay than I would prefere a DSA, since the
> ACL
> implementation is broken IMHO.
As long as reverse DNS can be faked, I would never use hostn
On Monday, 2009-08-10 at 14:03:44 +0200, Thomas Liske wrote:
> #Lupe Christoph wrote:
>> On Monday, 2009-08-10 at 13:46:38 +0200, Thomas Liske wrote:
>>> last week, there was an article on heise security about MTAs[1] which
>>> relay mails for hosts having a reverse resolution of 'localhost'.
>
Re,
#Lupe Christoph wrote:
On Monday, 2009-08-10 at 13:46:38 +0200, Thomas Liske wrote:
last week, there was an article on heise security about MTAs[1] which
relay mails for hosts having a reverse resolution of 'localhost'. Doing
a small test shows that sendmail on etch seems to be vulnerab
On Monday, 2009-08-10 at 13:46:38 +0200, Thomas Liske wrote:
> last week, there was an article on heise security about MTAs[1] which
> relay mails for hosts having a reverse resolution of 'localhost'. Doing
> a small test shows that sendmail on etch seems to be vulnerable, too. I
> need to h
Hi,
last week, there was an article on heise security about MTAs[1] which
relay mails for hosts having a reverse resolution of 'localhost'. Doing
a small test shows that sendmail on etch seems to be vulnerable, too. I
need to have a localhost RELAY line in my access file (which is not
default
10 matches
Mail list logo
