On Friday 12 September 2008 21:47:31 s. keeling wrote:
> Vincent Deffontaines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Marek Kubica a écrit :
> > > On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:25:13 +0100
> > >
> > > Pawe? Krzywicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> the solution was as Cerbelle said. Login as a normal user and do
> >
Vincent Deffontaines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Marek Kubica a écrit :
> > On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:25:13 +0100
> > Pawe? Krzywicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>> the solution was as Cerbelle said. Login as a normal user and do
> >>> sudo ( or you can activate root login from the login menu; but i
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 05:14:51AM -0400, Simon Valiquette wrote:
> Alexander Reichle-Schmehl un jour ?crivit:
>> Hi!
>> * Kheng Teong Goh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080912 04:21]:
>>> I have 2 system on slicehost running debian. apt-get update and apt-get
>>> upgrade has not been upgrading my kernel. It
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:21:53AM +0800, Kheng Teong Goh wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have 2 system on slicehost running debian. apt-get update and apt-get
> upgrade has not been upgrading my kernel. It has been upgrading other
> packages.
>
> Kernel remains as : 2.6.18-xen #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 06:40:50 UTC
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:51:38AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:33:00PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> >On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> >> +1021_new-style_firewire.patch
> >
> >etch+half kernel has old ieee1394, no need for that one.
>
> Thanks
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl un jour écrivit:
>>
I can see that CVE-2008-3272 and CVE-2008-3275 had already been fixed
in DSA-1630-1, but can you confirm that the other CVE doesn't affect
2.6.18?
Well... According to
http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/source-package/linux-2.6 it
isn't.
Hi!
* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080912 10:49]:
> > I have 2 system on slicehost running debian. apt-get update and apt-get
> > upgrade has not been upgrading my kernel. It has been upgrading other
> > packages.
> >
> > Kernel remains as : 2.6.18-xen #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 06:40:50
Hi!
* Simon Valiquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080912 11:14]:
[ Disclaimer: I'm not a member of the security team nor of our kernel
team, so I don't know any details ]
>> The latest kernel related DSA (1636) only affected the 2.6.24
>> kernel shipped with Etch-and-a-half.
> I can see that CV
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl un jour écrivit:
Hi!
* Kheng Teong Goh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080912 04:21]:
I have 2 system on slicehost running debian. apt-get update and apt-get
upgrade has not been upgrading my kernel. It has been upgrading other
packages.
Kernel remains as : 2.6.18-xen #1 SMP Tu
Kheng Teong Goh un jour écrivit:
Hi!
I have 2 system on slicehost running debian. apt-get update and apt-get
upgrade has not been upgrading my kernel. It has been upgrading other
packages.
Kernel remains as : 2.6.18-xen #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 06:40:50 UTC 2008 x86_64
Is it something I am not doing
Hi!
* Kheng Teong Goh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080912 04:21]:
> I have 2 system on slicehost running debian. apt-get update and apt-get
> upgrade has not been upgrading my kernel. It has been upgrading other
> packages.
>
> Kernel remains as : 2.6.18-xen #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 06:40:50 UTC 2008 x86_64
Hi,
If dependencies change (which happens occasionally with kernel meta-packages),
you will have to specify 'dist-upgrade' instead of 'upgrade'.
Best regards,
Holger
Am Freitag 12 September 2008 04:21:53 schrieb Kheng Teong Goh:
> Hi!
>
> I have 2 system on slicehost running debian. apt-get up
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
