Re: clamav.* package versions (etch)

NOTE: adding debian-security to the mix... On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Mike Dornberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > maybe there are build issues. If you count the binary versions, you'll see > there are 7 archs on which e. g. clamav-daemon 0.93 got built, but 10 for > 0.92-something. Perhaps

Re: libsnmp security update

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:17:54AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Alex Samad: > > > speaking from experience, I could have missed something, but when I > > unencrypted a encrypted private key it all worked (i used openssl), my > > presumption (and this might be were I am making a mistake) is tha

Re: libsnmp security update

* Alex Samad: > speaking from experience, I could have missed something, but when I > unencrypted a encrypted private key it all worked (i used openssl), my > presumption (and this might be were I am making a mistake) is that the > format for x509 cert's is a standard. I will follow up on this T