In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Ah, I see. I have never come across a program (yet) that uses it for
> shared memory. Perhaps I'm just running the wrong programs.
The program itself is not using it, its glibc2.2 which does use that (for
POSIX shm, I think not for SYSV. so its quite s
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:30:18 +0100 Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> why do you think it is named shm? it is used for shm_open and
> shm_unlink.
> (where glibc used temporary files to mmap them)
Ah, I see. I have never come across a program (yet) that uses it for
shared memory. Perha
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> It is for example used to map shared memory. ...
>
> No, it is a tmpfs directory for temporary files. It has nothing to do
> with shared memory.
why do you think it is named shm? it is used for shm_open and shm_unlink.
(where glibc used temporary file
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 08:23:45 +0100 Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >what kind applications are using /dev/shm? I googled
> > around,seem not find much information.
> > right now I mount i as rw,noexec,nosuid.
>
> It is for example used to map shared memory. ...
No, it is a t
Quoting Raphael Geissert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> include()? I don't want to imagine how many scripts will break.
Good catch. (It was very late in my time zone. I need to review that
list.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
Rick Moen wrote:
>
> disable_functions = dl, phpinfo, system, mail, include, shell_exec, exec,
include()? I don't want to imagine how many scripts will break.
Cheers,
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-a
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 11:15:35AM +, Keyser S?ze wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'd like to know whether it's possible to check the signature of a Debian
> (Etch) install CD, at the earliest stage of the install process.
> Indeed, right after the base-installer unpacks the base system files, apt
> loads t
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:55:11PM -0500, Luis Mondesi wrote:
> And besides, noexec can't even
> stop executables anyway. That's the stupidest of flags for mount:
>
> $> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /usr/bin/printf "%s\n" foo
> foo
I think some of the newer dynamic loaders do check noexec and refuse to
cir
Quoting Javier Fernandez-Sanguino ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Even better: /usr/share/doc/php5-common/examples/php.ini-paranoid
> (it includes some more functions in that definition)
Excellent. Amended to:
disable_functions = dl, phpinfo, system, mail, include, shell_exec, exec,
escapeshellarg, esc
2008/1/4, Rick Moen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Luis Mondesi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > It's time to tell PHP (via php.ini) not to allow any of those
> > functions that allow executing stuff from the system (system,
> > passthru, whatever).
>
> Amen to that. Good starting point:
> disable_func
Hi
I'd like to know whether it's possible to check the signature of a Debian
(Etch) install CD, at the earliest stage of the install process.
Indeed, right after the base-installer unpacks the base system files, apt loads
the contents of the CD and checks the Release.gpg signature against the Re
On Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 06:04:50 -0200, Felipe Figueiredo wrote:
> Anybody has a clue as to why was this default choosen, and not the safest one?
Too many broken PHP applications?
Anyway please see /usr/share/doc/php4-common/examples/ for
different examples. (Or /usr/share/doc/php5-common/e
Em Friday 04 January 2008 04:46:48 Rick Moen escreveu:
> Looking at the typical php.ini is faintly terrifying, starting with the
> almost invariably ignored warning comments at the top, saying these
> settings are for development environments only, and should never be
> exposed to public networks.
13 matches
Mail list logo
